BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FBS vs Tickmill Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FBS and Tickmill across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
VS
Tickmill

Tickmill

Score 4.3 / 5
4 bonuses

Among the lowest commissions available at $6 round-turn on Pro accounts, with strong FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation and transparent execution.

Visit Tickmill
Our Verdict
Tickmill winsby 0.4 pts

Tickmill edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
Tickmill
Tickmill
Recommended

Tickmill has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
Tickmill
Tickmill
Recommended

Tickmill has a cost edge: lower commission ($6/lot).

Best for beginners
Tickmill
Tickmill
Recommended

Tickmill edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FBS vs Tickmill: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FBSFBS
TickmillTickmill
Editorial score
3.9/ 5
4.3/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.5 / 5
4.4 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.5 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.8 / 5
4.0 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.0 / 5
4.1 / 5▲
Founded20092014
HeadquartersBelize City, BelizeLondon, United Kingdom
Min deposit$1$100
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$20/lot$6/lot
Max leverage3000:11000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
FCA
FSCA
CySEC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FBS Visit Tickmill

FBS vs Tickmill Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FBSFBS
TickmillTickmill

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

Industry-low commission of $6 round-turn on Pro account

Strong FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulatory coverage

No dealing desk on Pro and Raw accounts

Negative balance protection for retail clients

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

No cTrader support

Limited asset classes compared to multi-asset peers

Not available to US residents

No proprietary platform

FBS vs Tickmill: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

0
FBS
criteria wins
3
Tickmill
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFBSTickmill
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FBS vs Tickmill: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, Tickmill ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and Tickmill may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FBS and Tickmill offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while Tickmill requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

Tickmill holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Tickmill offers up to 1000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

Tickmill charges $6 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Tickmill offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS
Editor's Pick
Tickmill

Tickmill

Score 4.3 / 5

Visit Tickmill

More Broker Comparisons

More FBS comparisons

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

Exness

FBSvsExness

HFM

FBSvsHFM

FxPro

FBSvsFxPro

FXOpen

FBSvsFXOpen

XM

FBSvsXM

Alpari International

FBSvsAlpari International

ATFX

FBSvsATFX

More Tickmill comparisons

Windsor Brokers

TickmillvsWindsor Brokers

HFM

TickmillvsHFM

Exness

TickmillvsExness

Alpari International

TickmillvsAlpari International

FXTM

TickmillvsFXTM

RoboForex

TickmillvsRoboForex

XM

TickmillvsXM

OctaFX

TickmillvsOctaFX

Admirals

TickmillvsAdmirals

Libertex

TickmillvsLibertex

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker