Exnessvs
FBSForex Broker Comparison
Two brokers compete for everyday traders with similar $1 deposits but different regulatory footprints and pricing. The tension centers on regulation and cost versus instrument variety and leverage.
Our Verdict
Exness winsClear Winner
Exness outperforms FBS on editorial score and is the overall winner. FBS remains competitive in instrument variety.
Exness
4.4/5
FBS
3.9/5
Key Differences
- 1Exness has top-tier regulators; FBS does not.
- 2Exness provides investor compensation scheme; FBS does not.
- 3Exness offers 200 instruments; FBS offers 550.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
FBS offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.30 pips for Exness, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Exness vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.4/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.5 / 5 |
Exness vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Near-unlimited leverage on offshore entity
Extremely low $1 minimum deposit on Standard account
Instant withdrawals available 24/7 including weekends
One of the world's highest-volume retail FX brokers
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Exness vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
Exness
criteria wins
0
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Exness | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Exness vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Exness rates 4.4/5 versus 3.9/5 for FBS. Exness edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS starts from 0 pips, tighter than Exness's 0.3 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Both Exness and FBS require a minimum deposit of $1 to open a live trading account.
Exness holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, OJK), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Exness lists maximum leverage of 2000:1, while FBS lists up to 3000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Exness charges $3.5 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Exness supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
