BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FBS vs HFM Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FBS and HFM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
VS
HFM

HFM

Score 4.1 / 5
4 bonuses

No minimum deposit required, high leverage on offshore entity, and copy trading via HFcopy - with FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation.

Visit HFM
Our Verdict
HFM winsby 0.2 pts

HFM edges ahead with a score of 4.1/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
HFM
HFM
Recommended

HFM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
HFM
HFM
Recommended

HFM has a cost edge: lower commission ($6/lot).

Best for beginners
HFM
HFM
Recommended

HFM edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FBS vs HFM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FBSFBS
HFMHFM
Editorial score
3.9/ 5
4.1/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.5 / 5
4.1 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.1 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.8 / 5
4.0 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Founded20092010
HeadquartersBelize City, BelizeLimassol, Cyprus
Min deposit$1No minimum
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$20/lot$6/lot
Max leverage3000:12000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
FCA
FSCA
CySEC
DFSA
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FBS Visit HFM

FBS vs HFM Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FBSFBS
HFMHFM

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

No minimum deposit required to open an account

Copy trading via HFcopy platform

FCA, CySEC, and FSCA regulation

High leverage up to 2000:1 on offshore entity

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

2000:1 leverage is extremely risky for inexperienced traders

No cTrader support

Zero account commission of $6/lot is above some ECN peers

No proprietary platform

FBS vs HFM: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

0
FBS
criteria wins
3
HFM
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFBSHFM
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FBS vs HFM: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, HFM ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and HFM may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FBS and HFM offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

HFM has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes HFM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

HFM holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: HFM has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while HFM offers up to 2000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

HFM charges $6 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and HFM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS
Editor's Pick
HFM

HFM

Score 4.1 / 5

Visit HFM

More Broker Comparisons

More FBS comparisons

Exness

FBSvsExness

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

Alpari International

FBSvsAlpari International

ATFX

FBSvsATFX

XM

FBSvsXM

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

OctaFX

FBSvsOctaFX

FxPro

FBSvsFxPro

More HFM comparisons

Windsor Brokers

HFMvsWindsor Brokers

Exness

HFMvsExness

Alpari International

HFMvsAlpari International

FXTM

HFMvsFXTM

RoboForex

HFMvsRoboForex

Tickmill

HFMvsTickmill

XM

HFMvsXM

OctaFX

HFMvsOctaFX

Admirals

HFMvsAdmirals

Libertex

HFMvsLibertex

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker