BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

Admirals vs FBS Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of Admirals and FBS across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Admirals

Admirals

Score 4.3 / 5
2 bonuses

Multi-regulated broker with extensive account range, competitive Zero account spreads, strong EU regulation and quality webinar and education content.

Visit Admirals
VS
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
Our Verdict
Admirals winsby 0.4 pts

Admirals edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.5 pips for Admirals, reducing trading costs.

Best for safety & regulation
Admirals
Admirals
Recommended

Admirals has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer equivalent trading costs across spreads, commissions, and account types.

Best for beginners
Admirals
Admirals
Recommended

Admirals edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

Admirals vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
AdmiralsAdmirals
FBSFBS
Editorial score
4.3/ 5
3.9/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
4.3 / 5▲
3.5 / 5
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.4 / 5▲
4.0 / 5
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.2 / 5▲
3.8 / 5
Customer Support
10% weight
4.2 / 5▲
4.0 / 5
Founded20012009
HeadquartersTallinn, EstoniaBelize City, Belize
Min deposit$100$1
Spreads from0.5 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$6/lot$20/lot
Max leverage500:13000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FCA
ASIC
CySEC
KNF
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit Admirals Visit FBS

Admirals vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons

AdmiralsAdmirals
FBSFBS

Pros

Extensive range of accounts including Zero, Trade, and Invest

Strong FCA and CySEC regulation covering EU and UK traders

High-quality educational content including live webinars

Zero account offers spreads from 0.5 pips with $6 round-turn commission

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

Platform-heavy - MT4 and MT5 only, no proprietary platform

Customer support quality varies by region

Not available to US clients

Inactivity fee applies

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Admirals vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

3
Admirals
criteria wins
Ahead
1
FBS
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaAdmiralsFBS
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Pass
Fail
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Pass
Fail
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Fail
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Pass
Fail
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

Admirals vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, Admirals ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Admirals and FBS may each suit different trader profiles.

FBS offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to Admirals's spreads from 0.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while Admirals requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

Admirals holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

Admirals offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while FBS offers up to 3000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

Admirals charges $6 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

Admirals supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

Editor's Pick
Admirals

Admirals

Score 4.3 / 5

Visit Admirals
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS

More Broker Comparisons

More Admirals comparisons

Windsor Brokers

AdmiralsvsWindsor Brokers

HFM

AdmiralsvsHFM

Exness

AdmiralsvsExness

Alpari International

AdmiralsvsAlpari International

FXTM

AdmiralsvsFXTM

RoboForex

AdmiralsvsRoboForex

Tickmill

AdmiralsvsTickmill

XM

AdmiralsvsXM

OctaFX

AdmiralsvsOctaFX

Libertex

AdmiralsvsLibertex

More FBS comparisons

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

XM

FBSvsXM

FXOpen

FBSvsFXOpen

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

Exness

FBSvsExness

HFM

FBSvsHFM

GO Markets

FBSvsGO Markets

Forex.com

FBSvsForex.com

Blueberry Markets

FBSvsBlueberry Markets

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker