Blueberry Marketsvs
FBSForex Broker Comparison
Two brokers are compared on regulation, costs, and platform depth. The clash between Blueberry Markets and FBS tests which delivers stronger execution and trust for active traders.
Our Verdict
Blueberry Markets winsby 0.4 pts
Blueberry Markets edges FBS on the editorial score, supported by ASIC regulation with Tier 1 protections and transparent raw-spread ECN execution.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Blueberry Markets uses ASIC; FBS operates offshore via IFSC Belize.
- 2Blueberry offers cTrader; FBS lacks it.
- 3Min deposit differs: Blueberry requires $100, FBS offers $1 Cent accounts.
Who should choose Blueberry Markets vs FBS?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Blueberry Markets if…
Choose Blueberry Markets if you want ASIC regulation and a pure ECN execution model.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Blueberry Markets vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.5 / 5 |
Blueberry Markets vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
ASIC-regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Raw ECN Direct account with published execution statistics
No bonus marketing, pure execution focus
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Blueberry Markets vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Blueberry Markets
criteria wins
2
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Blueberry Markets | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Pass |
Blueberry Markets vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Blueberry Markets rates 4.3/5 and FBS rates 3.9/5. Blueberry Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both Blueberry Markets and FBS start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
FBS has $1, while Blueberry Markets requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Blueberry Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Blueberry Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while FBS lists up to 3000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Blueberry Markets charges $8 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Blueberry Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Blueberry Markets has exclusive access to cTrader.
