BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FBS vs TMGM Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FBS and TMGM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
VS
TMGM

TMGM

Score 4 / 5
2 bonuses

ASIC-regulated Australian broker with 10,000+ instruments including DMA equities, well-positioned for Asian traders who want Australian regulatory standards alongside a broad asset range.

Visit TMGM
Our Verdict
TMGM winsby 0.1 pts

TMGM edges ahead with a score of 4/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
TMGM
TMGM
Recommended

TMGM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
TMGM
TMGM
Recommended

TMGM has a cost edge: lower commission ($7/lot).

Best for platform choice
TMGM
TMGM
Recommended

TMGM offers more exclusive platform options: IRESS.

Best for beginners
TMGM
TMGM
Recommended

TMGM edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FBS vs TMGM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FBSFBS
TMGMTMGM
Editorial score
3.9/ 5
4.0/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.5 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.8 / 5
4.2 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.0 / 5
4.1 / 5▲
Founded20092013
HeadquartersBelize City, BelizeMelbourne, Australia
Min deposit$1$100
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$20/lot$7/lot
Max leverage3000:1500:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
ASIC
VFSC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
IRESS
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FBS Visit TMGM

FBS vs TMGM Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FBSFBS
TMGMTMGM

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

10,000+ instruments including real equities via IRESS DMA

ASIC regulated - Tier 1 Australian investor protections

ECN Edge account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 commission

Strong multilingual support for Asian clients

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

$100 minimum deposit on standard accounts

Less brand recognition than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia

IRESS DMA platform requires separate setup

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

FBS vs TMGM: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

0
FBS
criteria wins
2
TMGM
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFBSTMGM
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Fail
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FBS vs TMGM: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, TMGM ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and TMGM may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FBS and TMGM offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while TMGM requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

TMGM holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while TMGM offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

TMGM charges $7 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TMGM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; TMGM exclusively offers IRESS.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS
Editor's Pick
TMGM

TMGM

Score 4 / 5

Visit TMGM

More Broker Comparisons

More FBS comparisons

Blueberry Markets

FBSvsBlueberry Markets

Fusion Markets

FBSvsFusion Markets

Global Prime

FBSvsGlobal Prime

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

FP Markets

FBSvsFP Markets

ACY Securities

FBSvsACY Securities

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

GO Markets

FBSvsGO Markets

FXOpen

FBSvsFXOpen

Moneta Markets

FBSvsMoneta Markets

More TMGM comparisons

Windsor Brokers

TMGMvsWindsor Brokers

HFM

TMGMvsHFM

Exness

TMGMvsExness

Alpari International

TMGMvsAlpari International

FXTM

TMGMvsFXTM

RoboForex

TMGMvsRoboForex

Tickmill

TMGMvsTickmill

XM

TMGMvsXM

OctaFX

TMGMvsOctaFX

Admirals

TMGMvsAdmirals

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker