FBSvs
Fusion MarketsForex Broker Comparison
Two brokers contrast in cost, regulation, and platform reach. This matchup tests whether lower fees or stronger licensing better serve different traders.
Our Verdict
Fusion Markets winsby 0.3 pts
Fusion Markets edges FBS on editorial score (4.2 vs 3.9) and holds ASIC as a top-tier regulator, while FBS relies on offshore licensing.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Top-tier regulator: Fusion Markets holds ASIC; FBS relies on offshore licenses.
- 2Minimum deposit: Fusion Markets $0; FBS requires $1.
- 3Instruments: FBS lists 550; Fusion Markets 250.
Who should choose FBS vs Fusion Markets?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you value multilingual support, phone assistance, and a $1 minimum deposit, with 24/5 live chat, Cent and ECN account varieties, and broad regional presence across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa, plus client funds held in segregated accounts.
Choose Fusion Markets if…
Choose Fusion Markets if you want ASIC regulation, no minimum deposit, and lower commissions, plus access to MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a raw spreads option, and a transparent pricing structure, while enjoying client fund segregation and a reputable Australian broker infrastructure.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5▲ |
FBS vs Fusion Markets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts
MT4 and MT5 on all account types
Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN
Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa
Client funds held in segregated accounts
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
FBS
criteria wins
1
Fusion Markets
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FBS | Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.9/5 and Fusion Markets rates 4.2/5. Fusion Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both FBS and Fusion Markets start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Fusion Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Fusion Markets lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Fusion Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Fusion Markets has exclusive access to cTrader.
