BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FBS vs XM Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FBS and XM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
VS
XM

XM

Score 4.3 / 5
4 bonuses

Low minimum deposit, broad bonus program, and strong educational content. CySEC- and ASIC-regulated.

Visit XM
Our Verdict
XM winsby 0.4 pts

XM edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips for XM, reducing trading costs.

Best for safety & regulation
XM
XM
Recommended

XM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.

Best for beginners
XM
XM
Recommended

XM edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FBS vs XM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FBSFBS
XMXM
Editorial score
3.9/ 5
4.3/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.5 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.8 / 5
4.2 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.0 / 5
4.4 / 5▲
Founded20092009
HeadquartersBelize City, BelizeLimassol, Cyprus
Min deposit$1$5
Spreads from0 pips0.6 pips
Commission / lot$20/lotN/A
Max leverage3000:11000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree for most methods
Regulators
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
ASIC
CySEC
ASF
FSC
KNF
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FBS Visit XM

FBS vs XM Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FBSFBS
XMXM

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

USD 5 minimum deposit

Strong bonus program

Multilingual support

Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

Spreads not as tight as ECN-style brokers

Not available to US clients

No raw spread account option

Inactivity fee applies

No proprietary platform

FBS vs XM: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

2
FBS
criteria wins
3
XM
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFBSXM
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Fail
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Fail
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FBS vs XM: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, XM ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and XM may each suit different trader profiles.

FBS offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to XM's spreads from 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while XM requires at least $5. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

XM holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC, ASF), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while XM offers up to 1000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.

FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and XM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS
Editor's Pick
XM

XM

Score 4.3 / 5

Visit XM

More Broker Comparisons

More FBS comparisons

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

Alpari International

FBSvsAlpari International

Exness

FBSvsExness

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

HFM

FBSvsHFM

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

GO Markets

FBSvsGO Markets

Dupoin

FBSvsDupoin

FXOpen

FBSvsFXOpen

More XM comparisons

Windsor Brokers

XMvsWindsor Brokers

HFM

XMvsHFM

Exness

XMvsExness

Alpari International

XMvsAlpari International

FXTM

XMvsFXTM

RoboForex

XMvsRoboForex

Tickmill

XMvsTickmill

OctaFX

XMvsOctaFX

Admirals

XMvsAdmirals

Libertex

XMvsLibertex

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker