BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FBS vs Windsor Brokers Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FBS and Windsor Brokers across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
VS
Windsor Brokers

Windsor Brokers

Score 4 / 5
2 bonuses

One of the longest-operating CySEC-regulated brokers, offering standard and ECN accounts on MT4 and MT5 - a solid EU retail offering backed by a track record few Cyprus-based competitors can match.

Visit Windsor Brokers
Our Verdict
Windsor Brokers winsby 0.1 pts

Windsor Brokers edges ahead with a score of 4/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
Windsor Brokers
Windsor Brokers
Recommended

Windsor Brokers has a stronger safety profile: compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
Windsor Brokers
Windsor Brokers
Recommended

Windsor Brokers has a cost edge: lower commission ($8/lot).

Best for beginners
Windsor Brokers
Windsor Brokers
Recommended

Windsor Brokers edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FBSFBS
Windsor BrokersWindsor Brokers
Editorial score
3.9/ 5
4.0/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.5 / 5
4.2 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.8 / 5
3.8 / 5
Customer Support
10% weight
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Founded20091988
HeadquartersBelize City, BelizeNicosia, Cyprus
Min deposit$1$100
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$20/lot$8/lot
Max leverage3000:1500:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
FSCA
CySEC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FBS Visit Windsor Brokers

FBS vs Windsor Brokers Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FBSFBS
Windsor BrokersWindsor Brokers

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

35+ years of continuous operation - one of the longest track records in retail forex

CySEC regulated with EU investor protections

ECN Zero account from 0.0 pips + $8 commission

Islamic swap-free accounts available

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

Platform limited to MT4 and MT5 - no cTrader or proprietary option

$100 minimum deposit on standard accounts

ECN commission slightly above IC Markets and Pepperstone

No top-tier regulatory licence

Limited charting capabilities

FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

0
FBS
criteria wins
1
Windsor Brokers
criteria win
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFBSWindsor Brokers
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Fail
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Fail
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FBS vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, Windsor Brokers ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FBS and Windsor Brokers may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FBS and Windsor Brokers offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while Windsor Brokers requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

FBS is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. Windsor Brokers is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. Always confirm a broker's current regulatory status before opening an account.

For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FBS offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Windsor Brokers offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

Windsor Brokers charges $8 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Windsor Brokers offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS
Editor's Pick
Windsor Brokers

Windsor Brokers

Score 4 / 5

Visit Windsor Brokers

More Broker Comparisons

More FBS comparisons

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

Admirals

FBSvsAdmirals

HFM

FBSvsHFM

Alpari International

FBSvsAlpari International

OctaFX

FBSvsOctaFX

Exness

FBSvsExness

XM

FBSvsXM

FxPro

FBSvsFxPro

Libertex

FBSvsLibertex

More Windsor Brokers comparisons

HFM

Windsor BrokersvsHFM

Exness

Windsor BrokersvsExness

Alpari International

Windsor BrokersvsAlpari International

FXTM

Windsor BrokersvsFXTM

RoboForex

Windsor BrokersvsRoboForex

Tickmill

Windsor BrokersvsTickmill

XM

Windsor BrokersvsXM

OctaFX

Windsor BrokersvsOctaFX

Admirals

Windsor BrokersvsAdmirals

Libertex

Windsor BrokersvsLibertex

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker