Fusion Markets and RoboForex face off on cost, platform options, and regulation. This comparison teases where value lies for cost-conscious and platform-focused traders.
Fusion Markets edges RoboForex on editorial score, with ASIC regulation and lower ECN commissions.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Fusion Markets if…
Choose Fusion Markets for a $0 minimum deposit and low ECN commissions.
Choose RoboForex if…
Choose RoboForex for 24/5 live chat support and a broad platform suite.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.6 / 5 |
Pros
Among the lowest ECN commissions globally at $4.50/lot round-turn
No minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader
ASIC regulated with strong Australian broker infrastructure
ETF CFDs available at the same ultra-low commission rate
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Fusion Markets | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Pass |
The scores are close: Fusion Markets rates 4.2/5 and RoboForex rates 4/5. Fusion Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both Fusion Markets and RoboForex start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Fusion Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. RoboForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Fusion Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while RoboForex lists up to 2000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per lot, lower than RoboForex's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Fusion Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while RoboForex supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. RoboForex has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Fusion Markets is ASIC-regulated, with segregated funds, offering stronger regulatory protection.
RoboForex offers up to 2000:1 leverage and broad instrument access.
Fusion Markets is better suited for scalpers: lower commission ($4.5/lot).
RoboForex provides MT4/MT5, cTrader, and a proprietary R Trader.
Fusion Markets has a $0 minimum deposit simplifying initial trading.
RoboForex offers 9,400 instruments including stocks and ETFs.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.9 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5▲ |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2009 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Belize City, Belize |
|---|
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $10 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $4.5/lot▼ lower | $20/lot |
|---|
| 0.45 pips▼ lower | 2 pips |
| Max Leverage | 500:1▲ higher | 2,000:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerPayPal | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyPerfect MoneyCrypto |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerPayPal | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyPerfect MoneyCrypto |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC VFSC | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
|---|
| Platforms | cTrader MetaTrader 5 MetaTrader 4 | cTrader MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Pros
12,000+ instruments including real stocks and ETFs
cTrader available with full Level II and cAlgo
Multiple account types from Cent to ECN
R Trader proprietary platform with built-in analytics
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Smaller, newer broker (est. 2017) with limited global brand recognition
Limited research and educational content
VFSC license used for non-AU clients offers fewer protections
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
No 24/5 live chat
No phone support
Support available in limited languages
Cons
Primary entity uses IFSC Belize, offshore, limited protection
ECN commission of $20 round-turn is higher than IC Markets ($7)
Very high leverage (2000:1) amplifies risk significantly
No top-tier regulatory licence
No investor compensation scheme
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker