ACY Securities vs FBS Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of ACY Securities and FBS across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Score 4 / 5
2 bonusesASIC-regulated Australian broker with broad 2,200+ instrument coverage, TradingView integration, and raw ECN accounts - stronger on instrument breadth than on brand recognition.
VS
Our Verdict
ACY Securities winsby 0.1 pts
ACY Securities edges ahead with a score of 4/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
ACY Securities has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
ACY Securities has a cost edge: lower commission ($7/lot).
Best for platform choice
Recommended
ACY Securities offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView.
Best for beginners
Recommended
ACY Securities edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
ACY Securities vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.5 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 4.0 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.8 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Belize City, Belize |
| Min deposit | $50 | $1 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | $20/lot |
| Max leverage | 500:1 | 3000:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | ASIC FSA Seychelles | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 TradingView | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit ACY Securities | Visit FBS |
ACY Securities vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
2,200+ instruments including share CFDs and ETF CFDs
TradingView integration for browser-based chart execution
ASIC regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 round-turn commission
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts
MT4 and MT5 on all account types
Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN
Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
$200 minimum for ECN Ultra account
Less established brand than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia
Limited proprietary tools
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Cons
Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection
Bonus turnover requirements are onerous
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients
No top-tier regulatory licence
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
ACY Securities vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
ACY Securities
criteria wins
0
FBS
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | ACY Securities | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
ACY Securities vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, ACY Securities ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; ACY Securities and FBS may each suit different trader profiles.
Both ACY Securities and FBS offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.
FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while ACY Securities requires at least $50. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
ACY Securities holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, FSA Seychelles), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.
For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
ACY Securities offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while FBS offers up to 3000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
ACY Securities charges $7 per lot, lower than FBS's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView and FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; ACY Securities exclusively offers TradingView.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
More Broker Comparisons
More ACY Securities comparisons
More FBS comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker