A head-to-head comparison of Exness and TMGM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Exceptional value for developing-market traders - instant withdrawals, $1 minimum deposit, and ultra-competitive raw spread pricing.
ASIC-regulated Australian broker with 10,000+ instruments including DMA equities, well-positioned for Asian traders who want Australian regulatory standards alongside a broad asset range.
Exness edges ahead with a score of 4.4/5 vs TMGM's 4/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
TMGM offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.3 pips for Exness, reducing trading costs.
Exness has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Both brokers offer equivalent trading costs across spreads, commissions, and account types.
Exness edges out TMGM with a higher editorial score (4.4/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
| Editorial score | 4.4/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 4.3 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.4 / 5▲ | 4.2 / 5 |
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 4.1 / 5 |
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Melbourne, Australia |
| Min deposit | $1 | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0.3 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $3.5/lot | $7/lot |
| Max leverage | 2000:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC OJK | ASIC VFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 IRESS |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Exness | Visit TMGM |
Pros
Near-unlimited leverage on offshore entity
Extremely low $1 minimum deposit on Standard account
Instant withdrawals available 24/7 including weekends
One of the world's highest-volume retail FX brokers
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
10,000+ instruments including real equities via IRESS DMA
ASIC regulated - Tier 1 Australian investor protections
ECN Edge account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 commission
Strong multilingual support for Asian clients
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
Not available to US residents
EU clients face significant leverage restrictions
Unlimited leverage carries extreme risk for inexperienced traders
No proprietary platform
Cons
$100 minimum deposit on standard accounts
Less brand recognition than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia
IRESS DMA platform requires separate setup
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Exness | TMGM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Exness ranks higher with a score of 4.4/5 vs 4/5 for TMGM. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Exness and TMGM may each suit different trader profiles.
TMGM offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to Exness's spreads from 0.3 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Exness has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while TMGM requires at least $100. This makes Exness more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Exness and TMGM hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: Exness has a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Exness offers maximum leverage of 2000:1, while TMGM offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Exness charges $3.5 per lot, lower than TMGM's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Exness supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TMGM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; TMGM exclusively offers IRESS.
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 4 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker