BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

ATFX vs FBS Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of ATFX and FBS across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

ATFX

ATFX

Score 4.2 / 5
2 bonuses

FCA and CySEC-regulated broker with a fast-growing global footprint, 300+ instruments on MT4, and a strong presence in the UAE and Asian markets - built on institutional backing and multi-regional regulation.

Visit ATFX
VS
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5
2 bonuses

Offshore broker with CySEC and IFSC licensing, dominant in Southeast Asia and MENA through heavy localised marketing and generous bonuses - best evaluated on regulatory strength rather than promotion value.

Visit FBS
Our Verdict
ATFX winsby 0.3 pts

ATFX edges ahead with a score of 4.2/5 vs FBS's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1.8 pips for ATFX, reducing trading costs.

Best for safety & regulation
ATFX
ATFX
Recommended

ATFX has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.

Best for platform choice
FBS
FBS
Recommended

FBS offers more exclusive platform options: MetaTrader 5.

Best for beginners
ATFX
ATFX
Recommended

ATFX edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.2/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

ATFX vs FBS: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
ATFXATFX
FBSFBS
Editorial score
4.2/ 5
3.9/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
4.3 / 5▲
3.5 / 5
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
3.8 / 5
4.0 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
3.7 / 5
3.8 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
4.2 / 5▲
4.0 / 5
Founded20172009
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomBelize City, Belize
Min depositNo minimum$1
Spreads from1.8 pips0 pips
Commission / lotN/A$20/lot
Max leverage400:13000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
FCA
FSCA
CySEC
FSCA
CySEC
IFSC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit ATFX Visit FBS

ATFX vs FBS Forex Broker Pros & Cons

ATFXATFX
FBSFBS

Pros

FCA (UK), CySEC (EU), and FSCA (SA) licensing

300+ instruments including ETF CFDs and bond CFDs

FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK clients

No minimum deposit, no inactivity fee

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts

MT4 and MT5 on all account types

Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN

Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

MT4 only - no MT5, cTrader, or proprietary platform

Standard spreads from 1.8 pips are not ECN-competitive

Relatively young broker - founded 2017

No raw spread account option

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

Primary entity uses IFSC Belize - offshore, limited investor protection

Bonus turnover requirements are onerous

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a significant risk factor for retail clients

No top-tier regulatory licence

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

ATFX vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

2
ATFX
criteria wins
Ahead
1
FBS
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaATFXFBS
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Pass
Fail
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Pass
Fail
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Fail
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Fail
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

ATFX vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, ATFX ranks higher with a score of 4.2/5 vs 3.9/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; ATFX and FBS may each suit different trader profiles.

FBS offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to ATFX's spreads from 1.8 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.

ATFX has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes ATFX more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

ATFX holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: ATFX has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

ATFX offers maximum leverage of 400:1, while FBS offers up to 3000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.

ATFX supports MetaTrader 4 and FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4; FBS exclusively offers MetaTrader 5.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

Editor's Pick
ATFX

ATFX

Score 4.2 / 5

Visit ATFX
FBS

FBS

Score 3.9 / 5

Visit FBS

More Broker Comparisons

More ATFX comparisons

Windsor Brokers

ATFXvsWindsor Brokers

HFM

ATFXvsHFM

Exness

ATFXvsExness

Alpari International

ATFXvsAlpari International

FXTM

ATFXvsFXTM

RoboForex

ATFXvsRoboForex

Tickmill

ATFXvsTickmill

XM

ATFXvsXM

OctaFX

ATFXvsOctaFX

Admirals

ATFXvsAdmirals

More FBS comparisons

InstaForex

FBSvsInstaForex

HFM

FBSvsHFM

Exness

FBSvsExness

Tickmill

FBSvsTickmill

FXTM

FBSvsFXTM

XTB

FBSvsXTB

Skilling

FBSvsSkilling

Windsor Brokers

FBSvsWindsor Brokers

Trade Nation

FBSvsTrade Nation

FxPro

FBSvsFxPro

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker