AMarketsvs
FBSStock Broker Comparison
AMarkets and FBS sit at the same tier on overall editorial scores, but their stock access and platform approaches pull the comparison in different directions.
Our Verdict
Too close to call0.1 pts apart
AMarkets and FBS are closely matched overall. AMarkets provides access to 4 exchanges versus 3 for FBS.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Number of exchanges: AMarkets offers 4 exchanges vs 3 for FBS
- 2Proprietary platform: FBS provides a proprietary platform while AMarkets does not
- 3Minimum deposit: FBS requires $1; AMarkets requires $100
Who should choose AMarkets vs FBS?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want broader access to equities across four exchanges, enabling more diversified stock exposure. You also benefit from ECN pricing on Stocks CFDs, which can help maintain tighter execution costs for active traders who do not require a proprietary platform.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you value a proprietary platform and a $1 minimum deposit that lowers the entry barrier. You also gain MT4/MT5 access plus EA support and 24/7 multilingual help across Asian and CIS markets.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
FBS has multiple regulators including CySEC, IFSC and FSCA.
Best for active traders
Recommended
AMarkets vs FBS: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.3/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot▼ lower | $20/lot |
AMarkets vs FBS Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.2/5 and FBS rates 3.3/5. FBS has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and FBS start from the same spread of 0. For stock trading, also compare per-trade or per-share commissions to determine the total cost per transaction.
FBS has $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
AMarkets is regulated by SVGFSA. FBS is regulated by FSCA, CySEC. Confirm a broker's current regulatory status on the relevant regulator's public register before opening an account.
For beginners, FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry. Both brokers otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each brokers's site.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while FBS lists up to 3000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Neither AMarkets nor FBS is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
