AMarketsvs
ExnessStock Broker Comparison
This comparison pits AMarkets against Exness in the stocks CFDs arena. The axis of tension is regulation, platform depth, and market access.
Our Verdict
Exness winsby 0.4 pts
Exness is the editorial winner, as it scores 3.6 compared with AMarkets' 3.2.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Exness is regulated by FCA/CySEC/FSCA/OJK, while AMarkets uses SVGFSA.
- 2Exness offers five exchanges versus AMarkets' four.
- 3Exness has a compensation scheme; AMarkets does not.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Exness wins for safety and regulation with FCA/CySEC/FSCA/OJK oversight.
Best for active traders
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
AMarkets vs Exness: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.6/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.3 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | $3.5/lot▼ lower |
AMarkets vs Exness Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs Exness: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
Exness
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Exness |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Exness: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.2/5 and Exness rates 3.6/5. Exness has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
AMarkets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with Exness's 0.3. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
Exness has $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Exness more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Exness holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, OJK), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Exness stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Exness lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Exness charges $3.5 per trade, lower than AMarkets's $6 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Exness supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Neither AMarkets nor Exness is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Exness scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
