AMarketsvs
XMStock Broker Comparison
The comparison pits two multi-asset brokers with different regulatory footprints and product scopes against each other. The tension centers on trust, protection, and access to global equities.
Our Verdict
XM winsby 0.5 pts
XM edges AMarkets on the editorial score due to stronger regulation and broader market access. AMarkets remains competitive on execution and product range, but XM leads in safety coverage.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Regulatory oversight with compensation: XM is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, KNF, ASF and FSC.
- 2Exchanges covered: XM provides access to 10 exchanges, AMarkets to 4.
- 3Leverage up to 3000:1 vs 1000:1.
Who should choose AMarkets vs XM?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
XM wins due to multi-regulation and compensation protection.
Best for active traders
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
AMarkets vs XM: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $5▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.6 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
AMarkets vs XM Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs XM: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
XM
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | XM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs XM: Frequently Asked Questions
XM rates 3.7/5 versus 3.2/5 for AMarkets. XM edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with XM's 0.6. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
XM has $5, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes XM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
XM holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC, ASF), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
XM stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while XM lists up to 1000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for XM are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while XM supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Neither AMarkets nor XM is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
XM scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
