Admiralsvs
AMarketsStock Broker Comparison
Two brokers vie on regulation, stock access, and platform strategy. The contrast centers on commission structure, real share ownership, and global reach, inviting closer scrutiny.
Our Verdict
Admirals winsClear Winner
Admirals wins on editorial score, driven by strong regulation, commission-free real shares, and broader exchange access.
Admirals
4.0/5
AMarkets
3.2/5
Key Differences
- 1Commission-free real shares via Invest.MT5
- 2Top-tier regulation across FCA, CySEC, ASIC
- 3Access to 15 exchanges vs AMarkets' 4
Who should choose Admirals vs AMarkets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose Admirals if…
Choose Admirals if you want commission-free real shares via Invest.MT5, access to 15 exchanges, and a broad stock universe alongside ETFs. The package includes strong regulation across FCA, CySEC and ASIC, a formal compensation scheme, and negative balance protection for client safety.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you value ECN pricing on stocks CFDs and a broad product range beyond forex. You also access MT4 and MT5 with copy trading, but the broker operates under SVG/FSA offshore regulation with leverage up to 3000:1.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Admirals wins for low cost trading due to commission-free Invest.MT5 shares.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Admirals vs AMarkets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.2/ 5 |
| Min deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0.5 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | $6/lot |
Admirals vs AMarkets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Real share ownership via Invest.MT5 at zero commission alongside leveraged share CFDs
- 4,500+ stocks and ETFs across MT4 and MT5 with MetaTrader Supreme Edition
- FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulated, strong multi-jurisdictional profile
- No minimum deposit on standard accounts; FSCS protection for UK clients
Cons
- Invest.MT5 (real shares) and CFD account are separate products, no unified view
Admirals vs AMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
Admirals
criteria wins
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Admirals | AMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs AMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
Admirals rates 4/5 versus 3.2/5 for AMarkets. Admirals edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with Admirals's 0.5. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
Admirals has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Admirals more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Admirals holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Admirals stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Admirals lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while AMarkets lists up to 3000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Both Admirals and AMarkets charge the same commission of $6 per trade on applicable accounts. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Admirals offers commission-free stock trading while AMarkets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Admirals scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
