AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and Windsor Brokers across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
Windsor Brokers offers stocks CFDs on major global equities under CySEC regulation - a long-established broker with 35+ years of track record providing equity CFD access to European traders.
Windsor Brokers edges ahead with a score of 3.4/5 vs AMarkets's 3.2/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Windsor Brokers has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
AMarkets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Windsor Brokers edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.4/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FSCA CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit Windsor Brokers |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- CySEC regulated with ICF compensation fund coverage up to EUR 20,000
- 35+ year operating history - credibility unusual among CySEC-focused peers
- MT4/MT5 with competitive prime account pricing
- EU-focused - non-EU clients directed to less-regulated entity
- Limited stock selection vs dedicated equity brokers
- Research and educational content is limited
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Windsor Brokers ranks higher with a score of 3.4/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor Windsor Brokers is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Windsor Brokers scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Windsor Brokers offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Windsor Brokers offers negative balance protection; Windsor Brokers has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker