AMarketsvs
Windsor BrokersStock Broker Comparison
AMarkets and Windsor Brokers compete for stock CFDs across global markets. The clash centers on regulation quality, protection schemes, and service differentiation like live chat availability.
Our Verdict
Windsor Brokers winsby 0.2 pts
AMarkets and Windsor Brokers are closely matched overall. Windsor's stronger regulation and compensation protections contrast with AMarkets' 24/5 live chat support.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1AMarkets offers 24/5 live chat, Windsor Brokers does not.
- 2Windsor Brokers holds top-tier regulator status with CySEC and FSCA.
- 3Windsor offers compensation scheme coverage under ICF up to EUR 20,000.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want 24/5 live chat support and ECN-style stock CFD execution.
Choose Windsor Brokers if…
Choose Windsor Brokers if you want top-tier regulation and ICF compensation up to EUR 20,000.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Windsor Brokers wins for safety and regulation due to CySEC/FSCA oversight and ICF compensation.
Best for active traders
It’s a tie
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot▼ lower | $8/lot |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
3
Windsor Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.2/5 and Windsor Brokers rates 3.4/5. Windsor Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers start from the same spread of 0. For stock trading, also compare per-trade or per-share commissions to determine the total cost per transaction.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
Windsor Brokers holds top-tier regulation (CySEC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, Windsor Brokers provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Windsor Brokers lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than Windsor Brokers's $8 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Windsor Brokers supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Neither AMarkets nor Windsor Brokers is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Windsor Brokers scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
