AMarkets vs HFM Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and HFM across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
HFM comes out ahead with an editorial score of 3.8/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.2/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
HFM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
AMarkets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
HFM edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.8/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs HFM: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FCA FSCA CySEC DFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit HFM |
AMarkets vs HFM Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- HFcopy enables automatic copying of equity-focused strategies within the same account
- CySEC and DFSA regulated - strong dual-jurisdiction for EU and UAE clients
- 500+ share CFDs across MT4 and MT5 with no minimum deposit
- No inactivity fee; multilingual 24/5 customer support
- Stock range (500+) significantly narrower than CMC, IG, or Saxo
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- International FSA Seychelles entity provides substantially lighter regulatory protection
- HFcopy signal provider quality for equity strategies is variable
AMarkets vs HFM: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | HFM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs HFM: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, HFM ranks higher with a score of 3.8/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor HFM is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
HFM scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
HFM has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes HFM more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and HFM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: HFM has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); HFM offers negative balance protection; HFM has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
More HFM comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker