AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and ThinkMarkets across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
ThinkMarkets offers share CFDs on 3,000+ global stocks via MT4, MT5, and ThinkTrader under FCA and ASIC regulation - a well-regulated mobile-first broker with competitive share CFD pricing for active equity traders.
ThinkMarkets comes out ahead with an editorial score of 3.8/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.2/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
ThinkMarkets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
ThinkMarkets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
ThinkMarkets edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.8/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FCA FSCA ASIC JFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit ThinkMarkets |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- ThinkTrader rated among the best mobile CFD platforms for equity management
- 3,000+ share CFDs across US, UK, European, and ASX markets
- FCA and ASIC regulated - strong dual Tier 1 profile
- ThinkCopy enables social copying of equity strategies within the account
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- Stock range (3,000+) narrower than IG, CMC, or Saxo
- ThinkCopy ecosystem smaller than eToro's or NAGA's social platforms
- ThinkZero account (tighter spreads plus commission) requires separate application
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, ThinkMarkets ranks higher with a score of 3.8/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor ThinkMarkets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
ThinkMarkets scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
ThinkMarkets has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and ThinkMarkets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: ThinkMarkets has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); ThinkMarkets offers negative balance protection; ThinkMarkets has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker