AMarkets vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and Pepperstone across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
Pepperstone offers share CFDs on 1,000+ global stocks across MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView under FCA and ASIC regulation - a convenient route to equity CFD exposure for existing Pepperstone traders without switching brokers.
Pepperstone comes out ahead with an editorial score of 3.9/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.2/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Pepperstone has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Pepperstone has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Pepperstone edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FCA ASIC CySEC DFSA BaFin FMA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit Pepperstone |
AMarkets vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- 1,000+ share CFDs on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView - same account as forex
- FCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, and DFSA regulated - deepest multi-regulatory profile among ECN brokers
- IRESS available for DMA access to ASX and global equity markets
- Transparent commission structure on share CFDs (0.07%/side, min £7 on UK shares)
- 1,000+ stock selection narrower than CMC Markets (10,000+) or dedicated stockbrokers
- No real share ownership, ISA wrapper, or dividend reinvestment programme
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee for lower-volume traders
- Not suitable as a primary equity broker for buy-and-hold investors
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Pepperstone ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor Pepperstone is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Pepperstone scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); Pepperstone offers negative balance protection; Pepperstone has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker