AMarkets vs FP Markets Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and FP Markets across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
FP Markets offers direct-access share CFD trading via IRESS alongside standard MT4/MT5/cTrader share CFDs - a differentiated dual-model approach under ASIC and CySEC regulation that suits both ECN forex traders and equity-focused clients.
FP Markets comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.1/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.2/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
FP Markets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
FP Markets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
FP Markets edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | ASIC CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit FP Markets |
AMarkets vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- IRESS platform provides genuine DMA access to ASX, NYSE, LSE, and other exchanges
- 10,000+ share CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView
- ASIC and CySEC regulation - among the strongest regulatory profiles for a mid-tier broker
- No platform fee for standard share CFD trading (IRESS fee only for DMA users)
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee (~AUD 55) - uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- CFD-only for most share access; DMA limited to IRESS users
- IRESS has a steeper learning curve than MetaTrader or TradingView
- Not available to US residents
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, FP Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor FP Markets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
FP Markets scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
Both AMarkets and FP Markets require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and FP Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: FP Markets offers negative balance protection; FP Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker