AMarkets vs RoboForex Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and RoboForex across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
AMarkets offers stocks CFDs across major global markets - an offshore multi-asset broker with ECN execution and high leverage for experienced traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
RoboForex offers real stocks and share CFDs on 12,000+ instruments via R Trader, MT4, and MT5 under IFSC regulation - a high-instrument-count broker with genuine real stock access and one of the widest share ranges outside Tier 1 regulated platforms.
RoboForex comes out ahead with an editorial score of 3.8/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.2/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
RoboForex has a stronger safety profile: segregated funds, negative balance protection.
RoboForex has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
RoboForex edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.8/5 vs 3.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
AMarkets vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $10 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit RoboForex |
AMarkets vs RoboForex Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- Very high leverage amplifies equity CFD risk significantly
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement - not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
- IFSC (Belize) only - significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
- No formal investor compensation scheme equivalent to FSCS or CySEC
- Real stock settlement and custody practices require additional due diligence
- Less established brand recognition than Tier 1 regulated competitors
AMarkets vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, RoboForex ranks higher with a score of 3.8/5 vs 3.2/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither AMarkets nor RoboForex is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit of $10, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes RoboForex more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and RoboForex offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit ($10); RoboForex offers negative balance protection; RoboForex has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
AMarkets and RoboForex are both established stock brokers, but they differ in their regulatory profile, commission structure, and platform features. Use the side-by-side breakdown on this page to see where each broker has a clear advantage for your trading style.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker