FxPro vs RoboForex Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FxPro and RoboForex across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FXPro offers share CFDs on 100+ global stocks across MT4, MT5, cTrader, and its proprietary platform under FCA and CySEC regulation - a four-platform broker with straightforward equity CFD access for existing FXPro multi-asset traders.
RoboForex offers real stocks and share CFDs on 12,000+ instruments via R Trader, MT4, and MT5 under IFSC regulation - a high-instrument-count broker with genuine real stock access and one of the widest share ranges outside Tier 1 regulated platforms.
FxPro and RoboForex are extremely closely matched with scores of 3.8/5 and 3.8/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
FxPro has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
Both brokers share the same editorial score of 3.8/5, but RoboForex requires a lower minimum deposit ($10 vs $100 for FxPro), making it more accessible for new investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
FxPro vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $10 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Visit broker | Visit FxPro | Visit RoboForex |
FxPro vs RoboForex Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- All four major platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, FXPro Direct) support equity CFDs
- FCA and CySEC regulated with FSCS protection for UK clients
- No minimum deposit; no inactivity fee
- Algorithmic traders can deploy EAs/cBots on share CFDs within existing environments
- Narrowest stock selection (100+) among multi-platform regulated equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- Stock range limited to liquid blue-chips only
- Spreads not competitive for active equity trading vs specialist equity CFD brokers
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement - not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
- IFSC (Belize) only - significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
- No formal investor compensation scheme equivalent to FSCS or CySEC
- Real stock settlement and custody practices require additional due diligence
- Less established brand recognition than Tier 1 regulated competitors
FxPro vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FxPro | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FxPro vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
FxPro and RoboForex share the same editorial score of 3.8/5. The right choice depends on your priorities: commissions, fractional shares, account features, or regulatory safety.
Neither FxPro nor RoboForex is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
FxPro scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit of $10, while FxPro requires at least $100. This makes RoboForex more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
FxPro supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile and RoboForex offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit ($10). Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FxPro comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker