Forex.com vs RoboForex Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Forex.com and RoboForex across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FOREX.com offers share CFDs on 220+ global stocks via MT4, MT5, and its proprietary platform under NFA, FCA, and CFTC regulation - a well-regulated US-focused broker with integrated equity CFD access for active multi-asset traders.
RoboForex offers real stocks and share CFDs on 12,000+ instruments via R Trader, MT4, and MT5 under IFSC regulation - a high-instrument-count broker with genuine real stock access and one of the widest share ranges outside Tier 1 regulated platforms.
Forex.com edges ahead with a score of 3.9/5 vs RoboForex's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Forex.com has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
RoboForex has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Forex.com edges out RoboForex with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Forex.com vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $10 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CFTC MAS NFA IIROC | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Visit broker | Visit Forex.com | Visit RoboForex |
Forex.com vs RoboForex Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- NFA, CFTC, and FCA regulated - accessible to US residents who cannot use most CFD brokers
- Share CFDs on MT4, MT5, and proprietary Web Trader from a single account
- Reuters news and integrated economic calendar in the Web Trader
- No inactivity fee for actively funded accounts
- Narrowest stock selection (220+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- US regulatory framework limits leverage relative to FCA/CySEC brokers
- Higher minimum deposit ($100) than some competitors
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement - not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
- IFSC (Belize) only - significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
- No formal investor compensation scheme equivalent to FSCS or CySEC
- Real stock settlement and custody practices require additional due diligence
- Less established brand recognition than Tier 1 regulated competitors
Forex.com vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Forex.com | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
Forex.com vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Forex.com ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.8/5 for RoboForex. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither Forex.com nor RoboForex is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Forex.com scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit of $10, while Forex.com requires at least $100. This makes RoboForex more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Forex.com supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile and RoboForex offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: RoboForex has a lower minimum deposit ($10); Forex.com has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Forex.com comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker