RoboForexvs
ThinkMarketsStock Broker Comparison
RoboForex and ThinkMarkets square off with contrasting strengths across regulation, share access, and cost structures. Both target active equity traders but approach the market differently.
Our Verdict
Too close to call
RoboForex and ThinkMarkets are closely matched overall. Regulation is the clearest differentiator, with ThinkMarkets holding top-tier oversight while RoboForex does not.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Phone support is available from ThinkMarkets but not RoboForex.
- 2ThinkMarkets holds top-tier regulators while RoboForex does not.
- 3ThinkMarkets offers 12 exchanges vs RoboForex's 10.
Who should choose RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose RoboForex if…
Choose RoboForex if you want real stock ownership and a low minimum deposit.
Choose ThinkMarkets if…
Choose ThinkMarkets if you want top-tier regulation and a $0 minimum deposit.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
ThinkMarkets is regulated by FCA, ASIC, FSCA, and JFSA, offering a stronger top-tier profile.
Best for active traders
Recommended
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $10 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.4 pips |
| Commission / lot | $20/lot | $7/lot▼ lower |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement, not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
Cons
- IFSC (Belize) only, significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
RoboForex
criteria wins
3
ThinkMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | RoboForex | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
RoboForex and ThinkMarkets share the same editorial score of 3.8/5. One concrete differentiator: ThinkMarkets requires a lower minimum deposit.
RoboForex lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with ThinkMarkets's 0.4. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
ThinkMarkets holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, JFSA), providing stronger investor protections. RoboForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
RoboForex lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while ThinkMarkets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
ThinkMarkets charges $7 per trade, lower than RoboForex's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
RoboForex supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while ThinkMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary Web/Mobile and MetaTrader 4. RoboForex has exclusive access to cTrader. ThinkMarkets has exclusive access to TradingView.
Neither RoboForex nor ThinkMarkets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
ThinkMarkets scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
