RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of RoboForex and ThinkMarkets across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
RoboForex offers real stocks and share CFDs on 12,000+ instruments via R Trader, MT4, and MT5 under IFSC regulation - a high-instrument-count broker with genuine real stock access and one of the widest share ranges outside Tier 1 regulated platforms.
ThinkMarkets offers share CFDs on 3,000+ global stocks via MT4, MT5, and ThinkTrader under FCA and ASIC regulation - a well-regulated mobile-first broker with competitive share CFD pricing for active equity traders.
RoboForex and ThinkMarkets are extremely closely matched with scores of 3.8/5 and 3.8/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
ThinkMarkets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
Both brokers share the same editorial score of 3.8/5, but ThinkMarkets requires a lower minimum deposit ($0 vs $10 for RoboForex), making it more accessible for new investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $10 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FSCA CySEC IFSC | FCA FSCA ASIC JFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView |
| Visit broker | Visit RoboForex | Visit ThinkMarkets |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement - not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
- IFSC (Belize) only - significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
- No formal investor compensation scheme equivalent to FSCS or CySEC
- Real stock settlement and custody practices require additional due diligence
- Less established brand recognition than Tier 1 regulated competitors
- ThinkTrader rated among the best mobile CFD platforms for equity management
- 3,000+ share CFDs across US, UK, European, and ASX markets
- FCA and ASIC regulated - strong dual Tier 1 profile
- ThinkCopy enables social copying of equity strategies within the account
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- Stock range (3,000+) narrower than IG, CMC, or Saxo
- ThinkCopy ecosystem smaller than eToro's or NAGA's social platforms
- ThinkZero account (tighter spreads plus commission) requires separate application
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | RoboForex | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
RoboForex and ThinkMarkets share the same editorial score of 3.8/5. The right choice depends on your priorities: commissions, fractional shares, account features, or regulatory safety.
Neither RoboForex nor ThinkMarkets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
ThinkMarkets scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
ThinkMarkets has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
RoboForex supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile and ThinkMarkets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: ThinkMarkets has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum). Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More RoboForex comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker