FXTM vs RoboForex Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FXTM and RoboForex across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FXTM offers share CFDs on 180+ global stocks via MT4 and MT5 under CySEC and FCA regulation - a well-regulated broker with a strong emerging market presence and integrated FXTM Invest copy trading for equity strategies.
RoboForex offers real stocks and share CFDs on 12,000+ instruments via R Trader, MT4, and MT5 under IFSC regulation - a high-instrument-count broker with genuine real stock access and one of the widest share ranges outside Tier 1 regulated platforms.
FXTM and RoboForex are extremely closely matched with scores of 3.7/5 and 3.8/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
FXTM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
RoboForex has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
RoboForex edges out FXTM with a higher editorial score (3.8/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
FXTM vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.7/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | $10 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA FSCA CySEC FSC | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Visit broker | Visit FXTM | Visit RoboForex |
FXTM vs RoboForex Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- CySEC and FCA regulated - strong dual-jurisdiction for EU and UK client protection
- FXTM Invest copy trading enables following of equity-focused Strategy Managers
- 180+ share CFDs via MT4 and MT5 with strong emerging market accessibility
- No inactivity fee; multilingual support in 35+ languages
- Narrowest stock range (180+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- FSC Mauritius entity provides substantially lighter regulatory protection
- Limited stock analytical tools beyond standard MT4/MT5 charting
- 12,000+ instruments including genuine real US stocks and ETFs via R Trader
- Real stock ownership with dividend entitlement - not just CFD exposure
- One of the widest equity instrument ranges among multi-asset forex brokers
- No inactivity fee; competitive spreads on ECN account types
- IFSC (Belize) only - significantly weaker regulation than FCA, ASIC, or CySEC
- No formal investor compensation scheme equivalent to FSCS or CySEC
- Real stock settlement and custody practices require additional due diligence
- Less established brand recognition than Tier 1 regulated competitors
FXTM vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FXTM | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FXTM vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, RoboForex ranks higher with a score of 3.8/5 vs 3.7/5 for FXTM. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither FXTM nor RoboForex is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
FXTM scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
FXTM has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes FXTM more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
FXTM supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and RoboForex offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: FXTM has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); RoboForex has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FXTM comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker