FBS vs Forex.com Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FBS and Forex.com across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FBS offers stocks CFDs with a $1 minimum deposit and MT4/MT5 support - an accessible entry to equity markets for traders in CIS and Asian markets, primarily regulated offshore.
FOREX.com offers share CFDs on 220+ global stocks via MT4, MT5, and its proprietary platform under NFA, FCA, and CFTC regulation - a well-regulated US-focused broker with integrated equity CFD access for active multi-asset traders.
Forex.com comes out ahead with an editorial score of 3.9/5 compared to FBS's 3.3/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Forex.com has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Forex.com has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Forex.com edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (3.9/5 vs 3.3/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
FBS vs Forex.com: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $1 | $100 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FSCA CySEC IFSC | FCA ASIC CFTC MAS NFA IIROC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Visit broker | Visit FBS | Visit Forex.com |
FBS vs Forex.com Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- $1 minimum deposit - widest accessibility for equity CFD markets
- MT4/MT5 with full EA support for automated stock strategies
- 24/7 multilingual support across Asian and CIS markets
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) - minimal investor protection
- Limited stock selection vs dedicated equity brokers
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
- NFA, CFTC, and FCA regulated - accessible to US residents who cannot use most CFD brokers
- Share CFDs on MT4, MT5, and proprietary Web Trader from a single account
- Reuters news and integrated economic calendar in the Web Trader
- No inactivity fee for actively funded accounts
- Narrowest stock selection (220+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, or dividend entitlement
- US regulatory framework limits leverage relative to FCA/CySEC brokers
- Higher minimum deposit ($100) than some competitors
FBS vs Forex.com: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FBS | Forex.com |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs Forex.com: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Forex.com ranks higher with a score of 3.9/5 vs 3.3/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither FBS nor Forex.com is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Forex.com scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
FBS has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while Forex.com requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Forex.com offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: FBS has a lower minimum deposit ($1); Forex.com offers negative balance protection; Forex.com has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FBS comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker