FBSvs
FP MarketsStock Broker Comparison
In this matchup, FBS emphasizes ultra-low entry and MT4/MT5 automation for stock CFDs, while FP Markets blends regulated broad access and diverse platforms.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsClear Winner
FP Markets edges out FBS on editorial score due to stronger regulation and broader platform access, though both offer stock CFDs on MT4/MT5.
FP Markets
4.1/5
FBS
3.3/5
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets has top-tier regulators (ASIC and CySEC).
- 2FP Markets provides access to 15 exchanges via IRESS.
- 3FBS relies on a proprietary platform alongside MT4/MT5.
Who should choose FBS vs FP Markets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want a $1 minimum deposit and MT4/MT5 with full EA support.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want strong regulation and broad exchange access via IRESS.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
FP Markets has ASIC and CySEC regulation, a stronger safety profile.
Best for active traders
Recommended
FBS vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $1▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $20/lot | $6/lot▼ lower |
FBS vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility for equity CFD markets
- MT4/MT5 with full EA support for automated stock strategies
- 24/7 multilingual support across Asian and CIS markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize), minimal investor protection
- Limited stock selection vs dedicated equity brokers
FBS vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
FBS
criteria wins
4
FP Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FBS | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FBS vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
FP Markets rates 4.1/5 versus 3.3/5 for FBS. FP Markets edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both FBS and FP Markets start from the same spread of 0. For stock trading, also compare per-trade or per-share commissions to determine the total cost per transaction.
FBS has $1, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes FBS more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
FP Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: FBS requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and FP Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while FP Markets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and TradingView.
Neither FBS nor FP Markets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
FP Markets scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
