Admirals vs FP Markets Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Admirals and FP Markets across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Admirals offers share CFDs and real stocks on 4,500+ equities via MT4, MT5, and Invest.MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation - combining professional MetaTrader CFD trading with real share ownership for buy-and-hold investors.
FP Markets offers direct-access share CFD trading via IRESS alongside standard MT4/MT5/cTrader share CFDs - a differentiated dual-model approach under ASIC and CySEC regulation that suits both ECN forex traders and equity-focused clients.
Admirals and FP Markets are extremely closely matched with scores of 4/5 and 4.1/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Admirals offers commission-free trading while FP Markets does not, making Admirals the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Admirals has the edge for active traders: commission-free trading, advanced charting.
FP Markets edges out Admirals with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Admirals vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | $100 |
| Commission-free | Yes | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CySEC KNF | ASIC CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit Admirals | Visit FP Markets |
Admirals vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Real share ownership via Invest.MT5 at zero commission alongside leveraged share CFDs
- 4,500+ stocks and ETFs across MT4 and MT5 with MetaTrader Supreme Edition
- FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulated - strong multi-jurisdictional profile
- No minimum deposit on standard accounts; FSCS protection for UK clients
- Invest.MT5 (real shares) and CFD account are separate products - no unified view
- No ISA or SIPP tax wrapper available
- MetaTrader only - no proprietary trading platform beyond the Supreme Edition plugin
- Inactivity fee applies on Invest.MT5 accounts after dormancy
- IRESS platform provides genuine DMA access to ASX, NYSE, LSE, and other exchanges
- 10,000+ share CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView
- ASIC and CySEC regulation - among the strongest regulatory profiles for a mid-tier broker
- No platform fee for standard share CFD trading (IRESS fee only for DMA users)
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee (~AUD 55) - uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- CFD-only for most share access; DMA limited to IRESS users
- IRESS has a steeper learning curve than MetaTrader or TradingView
- Not available to US residents
Admirals vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Admirals | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, FP Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 4/5 for Admirals. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Admirals offers commission-free stock trading while FP Markets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both Admirals and FP Markets hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
Admirals has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Admirals more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and FP Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Admirals has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); FP Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Admirals comparisons
More FP Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker