Admirals vs FBS Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Admirals and FBS across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Admirals offers share CFDs and real stocks on 4,500+ equities via MT4, MT5, and Invest.MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation - combining professional MetaTrader CFD trading with real share ownership for buy-and-hold investors.
Admirals comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4/5 compared to FBS's 3.3/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Admirals offers commission-free trading while FBS does not, making Admirals the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Admirals has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Admirals has the edge for active traders: commission-free trading, advanced charting.
Admirals edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4/5 vs 3.3/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Admirals vs FBS: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.3/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | $1 |
| Commission-free | Yes | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CySEC KNF | FSCA CySEC IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
| Visit broker | Visit Admirals | Visit FBS |
Admirals vs FBS Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Real share ownership via Invest.MT5 at zero commission alongside leveraged share CFDs
- 4,500+ stocks and ETFs across MT4 and MT5 with MetaTrader Supreme Edition
- FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulated - strong multi-jurisdictional profile
- No minimum deposit on standard accounts; FSCS protection for UK clients
- Invest.MT5 (real shares) and CFD account are separate products - no unified view
- No ISA or SIPP tax wrapper available
- MetaTrader only - no proprietary trading platform beyond the Supreme Edition plugin
- Inactivity fee applies on Invest.MT5 accounts after dormancy
- $1 minimum deposit - widest accessibility for equity CFD markets
- MT4/MT5 with full EA support for automated stock strategies
- 24/7 multilingual support across Asian and CIS markets
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) - minimal investor protection
- Limited stock selection vs dedicated equity brokers
- No real share ownership - CFDs only
Admirals vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Admirals | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Admirals ranks higher with a score of 4/5 vs 3.3/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Admirals offers commission-free stock trading while FBS does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Admirals scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
Admirals has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Admirals more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and FBS offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Admirals has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); Admirals offers negative balance protection; Admirals has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Admirals comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker