Interactive Brokersvs
RoboForexForex Broker Comparison
Interactive Brokers and RoboForex face off on regulation, costs, and platform choice, highlighting different strengths for traders.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsClear Winner
Interactive Brokers is the overall winner, supported by top-tier regulation and broad instrument access, while RoboForex lags on regulation.
Interactive Brokers
4.6/5
RoboForex
4.0/5
Key Differences
- 1RoboForex supports MT4/MT5, Interactive Brokers does not.
- 2Top-tier regulation favors Interactive Brokers with FCA/ASIC, RoboForex lacks top-tier licence.
- 3Interactive Brokers offers 17,000 instruments; RoboForex has 9,400.
Who should choose Interactive Brokers vs RoboForex?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you value strong regulation and you want a vast instrument universe.
Choose RoboForex if…
Choose RoboForex if you want MT4/MT5 and multiple platforms.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
RoboForex offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.20 pips for Interactive Brokers, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Interactive Brokers vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.8 / 5▲ | 3.6 / 5 |
Interactive Brokers vs RoboForex Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Available to US residents
Lowest margin rates in industry
150+ global markets
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Interactive Brokers vs RoboForex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
2
RoboForex
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Interactive Brokers | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Interactive Brokers vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4.6/5 versus 4/5 for RoboForex. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
RoboForex starts from 0 pips, tighter than Interactive Brokers's 0.2 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Interactive Brokers holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, JFSA), providing stronger investor protections. RoboForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Interactive Brokers lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while RoboForex lists up to 2000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot, lower than RoboForex's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile, while RoboForex supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS). RoboForex has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
