RoboForexvs
ThinkMarketsForex Broker Comparison
In this comparison, RoboForex and ThinkMarkets clash on regulation strength, cost structures, and platform options. The axis of tension is protection versus instrument variety.
Our Verdict
ThinkMarkets winsby 0.2 pts
ThinkMarkets is the editorial winner, scoring higher for top-tier regulators and an investor compensation scheme, while RoboForex lags on protection.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Top-tier regulators: ThinkMarkets holds FCA/ASIC/FSCA/JFSA.
- 2Investor compensation scheme coverage provided by ThinkMarkets.
- 3Instrument count: RoboForex offers 9400 vs ThinkMarkets 4000.
Who should choose RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose RoboForex if…
Choose RoboForex if you want a very low $10 minimum and a large instrument pool including real stocks and ETFs.
Choose ThinkMarkets if…
Choose ThinkMarkets if you want no minimum deposit on standard accounts and strong regulation with investor compensation coverage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
RoboForex offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.40 pips for ThinkMarkets, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.6 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
12,000+ instruments including real stocks and ETFs
cTrader available with full Level II and cAlgo
Multiple account types from Cent to ECN
R Trader proprietary platform with built-in analytics
Client funds held in segregated accounts
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
RoboForex
criteria wins
2
ThinkMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | RoboForex | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
RoboForex vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: RoboForex rates 4/5 and ThinkMarkets rates 4.2/5. ThinkMarkets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
RoboForex starts from 0 pips, tighter than ThinkMarkets's 0.4 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, while RoboForex requires at least $10. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
ThinkMarkets holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. RoboForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
RoboForex lists maximum leverage of 2000:1, while ThinkMarkets lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
ThinkMarkets charges $7 per lot, lower than RoboForex's $20 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
RoboForex supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while ThinkMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary Web/Mobile and MetaTrader 4. RoboForex has exclusive access to cTrader. ThinkMarkets has exclusive access to TradingView.
