Interactive Brokersvs
Windsor BrokersForex Broker Comparison
This side-by-side comparison pits two established brokers against each other on regulation, costs, and platform options, with attention to instrument breadth and execution quality.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsClear Winner
Interactive Brokers edges Windsor Brokers on editorial score and platform breadth, offering 17,000 instruments and a proprietary platform.
Interactive Brokers
4.6/5
Windsor Brokers
4.0/5
Key Differences
- 1Instrument universe: Interactive Brokers offers 17,000 instruments vs 200 for Windsor.
- 2Proprietary platform: Interactive Brokers has a proprietary platform; Windsor Brokers does not.
- 3Top-tier regulation: Interactive Brokers is regulated by FCA/ASIC; Windsor lacks these.
Who should choose Interactive Brokers vs Windsor Brokers?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want the broadest instrument universe and a proprietary trading platform that integrates advanced tools for active execution. You also gain access to top-tier regulation, robust client fund protection, and transparent pricing, with no minimum deposit.
Choose if…
Choose Windsor Brokers if you prioritize familiar MT4/MT5 platforms and a regulated EU-based framework with CySEC oversight. You access a straightforward ECN Zero style option on MT4/MT5, a modest minimum deposit, and 24/5 live support with multilingual help.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Windsor Brokers offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.20 pips for Interactive Brokers, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Interactive Brokers vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.8 / 5▲ | 4.2 / 5 |
Interactive Brokers vs Windsor Brokers Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Available to US residents
Lowest margin rates in industry
150+ global markets
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Interactive Brokers vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
2
Windsor Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Interactive Brokers | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Interactive Brokers vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4.6/5 versus 4/5 for Windsor Brokers. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Windsor Brokers starts from 0 pips, tighter than Interactive Brokers's 0.2 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while Windsor Brokers requires at least $100. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Interactive Brokers holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, JFSA), providing stronger investor protections. Windsor Brokers may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Interactive Brokers lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while Windsor Brokers lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot, lower than Windsor Brokers's $8 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile, while Windsor Brokers supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile. Windsor Brokers has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
