AMarkets vs TradeStation Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and TradeStation across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.
VS
Score 4.3 / 5
2 bonusesFINRA and NFA-regulated US broker with 40+ years of history and a best-in-class proprietary platform for US active and algorithmic traders - the go-to for serious traders who want equities, futures, options, and forex from one account.
Our Verdict
TradeStation winsby 0.5 pts
TradeStation edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs AMarkets's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 1 pips for TradeStation, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
TradeStation has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for active traders
Recommended
AMarkets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.
Best for platform choice
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer an equivalent platform selection with similar exclusive and proprietary options.
Best for beginners
Recommended
TradeStation edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
AMarkets vs TradeStation: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.3/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2007 | 1982 |
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Plantation, Florida, United States |
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 1 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
| Max leverage | 3000:1 | 50:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FINRA NFA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | Proprietary Web/Mobile |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit TradeStation |
AMarkets vs TradeStation Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
40+ years of operation - one of the longest track records in US retail trading
EasyLanguage strategy platform with the deepest retail backtesting ecosystem
Equities, futures, options, and forex from one account
FINRA and NFA regulated - highest US retail standards
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
Mobile trading app available
Proprietary trading platform available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection
No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Forex is secondary to the equities/futures offering - not an ECN-first FX desk
50:1 leverage cap under US Dodd-Frank rules
US clients only - not available to international traders
Desktop platform has a steep learning curve
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
No MetaTrader support
Support available in limited languages
AMarkets vs TradeStation: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
AMarkets
criteria wins
5
TradeStation
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | TradeStation |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
AMarkets vs TradeStation: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, TradeStation ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.8/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and TradeStation may each suit different trader profiles.
AMarkets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to TradeStation's spreads from 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
TradeStation has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes TradeStation more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
TradeStation holds top-tier regulation (FINRA, NFA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.
For beginners: TradeStation has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; TradeStation offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while TradeStation offers up to 50:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradeStation offers Proprietary Web/Mobile; AMarkets exclusively offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; TradeStation exclusively offers Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.8 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker