AMarketsvs
ThinkMarketsForex Broker Comparison
This comparison pits two regulated forex brokers across trust, fees, and platforms. The axis of tension centers on regulatory breadth and platform options.
Our Verdict
ThinkMarkets winsby 0.4 pts
ThinkMarkets edges AMarkets on editorial score and regulatory breadth, earning the higher overall rating.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Instruments: ThinkMarkets has 4000 vs AMarkets 250.
- 2Regulation breadth: ThinkMarkets FCA/ASIC/FSCA/JFSA; AMarkets lacks top-tier regulators.
- 3Proprietary platform: ThinkMarkets offers ThinkTrader; AMarkets has none.
Who should choose AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you accept a smaller 250-instrument range and no top-tier regulator. You also trade with no compensation scheme and no negative balance protection, which keeps the cost structure clear but limits regulatory protections.
Choose ThinkMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you accept a smaller 250-instrument range and no top-tier regulator. You also trade with no compensation scheme and no negative balance protection, which keeps the cost structure clear but limits regulatory protections.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.40 pips for ThinkMarkets, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
5
ThinkMarkets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs ThinkMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.8/5 and ThinkMarkets rates 4.2/5. ThinkMarkets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
AMarkets starts from 0 pips, tighter than ThinkMarkets's 0.4 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
ThinkMarkets has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes ThinkMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
ThinkMarkets holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
ThinkMarkets stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while ThinkMarkets lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot, lower than ThinkMarkets's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while ThinkMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader. ThinkMarkets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile and TradingView.
