Two brokers contend on regulation, fees, and platform options in a high-stakes comparison. The axis of tension centers on trust, cost, and how each platform aligns with trader needs.
Moneta Markets is the overall winner by editorial score, scoring higher than AMarkets. Its broader regulatory footprint and multi licensing underpin a higher overall rating.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you want MT4/MT5 and cTrader with ECN pricing and no proprietary platform.
Choose Moneta Markets if…
Choose Moneta Markets if you prefer a proprietary AppTrader platform with advanced charting and negative balance protection.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | AMarkets | Moneta Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.8/5 and Moneta Markets rates 4.1/5. Moneta Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and Moneta Markets start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Moneta Markets has $50, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Moneta Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Moneta Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, FSCA, FSA Seychelles), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Moneta Markets stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Moneta Markets lists up to 1000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Both AMarkets and Moneta Markets charge the same commission of $6 per lot on applicable accounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Moneta Markets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader. Moneta Markets has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Moneta Markets wins for safety and regulation with ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licences and fund segregation.
Moneta Markets wins for active traders due to Pro ECN raw spreads, MT4/MT5, and a proprietary platform.
Both brokers offer equivalent ECN conditions including raw spread accounts, commissions, and spread levels.
Moneta Markets wins for platform choice with a proprietary AppTrader plus MT4 and MT5.
Moneta Markets is best for beginners because of negative balance protection and regulated safeguards.
Moneta Markets leads instrument variety with about 1000 offerings versus AMarkets 250.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.4 / 5▲ |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.1 / 5▲ | 4.0 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2019 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Sydney, Australia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $50▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | $6/lot |
|---|
| 0.6 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Max Leverage | 3,000:1▲ higher | 1,000:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNeteller |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNeteller |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | SVGFSA | ASIC FSCA FSA Seychelles |
|---|
| Platforms | cTrader MetaTrader 5 MetaTrader 4 | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
ASIC, FSCA, and FSA Seychelles licensing, choice of regulatory framework
Pro ECN account: 0.0 pip spreads with $6 commission
MT4, MT5, and proprietary AppTrader platform
Strong localisation for Africa and Asia
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
SVG FSA registration only, no meaningful retail investor protection
No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Founded 2019, limited track record vs established competitors
Lower brand recognition outside Africa and Asia
FSA Seychelles entity offers limited investor protection
No investor compensation scheme
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.8 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker