AMarketsvs
BDSwissForex Broker Comparison
This matchup contrasts AMarkets and BDSwiss on regulation, protections, and platform choices. The tension centers on safety and execution quality.
Who should choose AMarkets vs BDSwiss?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
Choose AMarkets if you want MT4/MT5 and cTrader access with a mature PAMM platform.
Choose if…
Choose BDSwiss if you value CySEC regulation with EU compensation and a proprietary WebTrader.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
AMarkets vs BDSwiss: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
AMarkets vs BDSwiss Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
AMarkets vs BDSwiss: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
5
BDSwiss
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | BDSwiss |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs BDSwiss: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.8/5 and BDSwiss rates 3.9/5. BDSwiss has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and BDSwiss start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
BDSwiss has $10, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes BDSwiss more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
BDSwiss holds top-tier regulation (CySEC, FSA Seychelles, FSC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
BDSwiss stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while BDSwiss lists up to 30:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Both AMarkets and BDSwiss charge the same commission of $6 per lot on applicable accounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while BDSwiss supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader. BDSwiss has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
