BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

AMarkets vs XM Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and XM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

AMarkets

AMarkets

Score 3.8 / 5
2 bonuses

SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.

Visit AMarkets
VS
XM

XM

Score 4.3 / 5
4 bonuses

Low minimum deposit, broad bonus program, and strong educational content. CySEC- and ASIC-regulated.

Visit XM
Our Verdict
XM winsby 0.5 pts

XM edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs AMarkets's 3.8/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
AMarkets
AMarkets
Recommended

AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips for XM, reducing trading costs.

Best for safety & regulation
XM
XM
Recommended

XM has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
AMarkets
AMarkets
Recommended

AMarkets has a cost edge: raw/ECN spreads, tighter spreads from 0 pips.

Best for platform choice
AMarkets
AMarkets
Recommended

AMarkets offers more exclusive platform options: cTrader.

Best for beginners
XM
XM
Recommended

XM edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

AMarkets vs XM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
AMarketsAMarkets
XMXM
Editorial score
3.8/ 5
4.3/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.4 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.1 / 5
4.2 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
3.9 / 5
4.4 / 5▲
Founded20072009
HeadquartersKingstown, Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesLimassol, Cyprus
Min deposit$100$5
Spreads from0 pips0.6 pips
Commission / lot$6/lotN/A
Max leverage3000:11000:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree for most methods
Regulators
SVGFSA
ASIC
CySEC
ASF
FSC
KNF
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit AMarkets Visit XM

AMarkets vs XM Forex Broker Pros & Cons

AMarketsAMarkets
XMXM

Pros

MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available

Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission

Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency

No inactivity fee

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

USD 5 minimum deposit

Strong bonus program

Multilingual support

Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Cons

SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection

No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier

No top-tier regulatory licence

No negative balance protection

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

Spreads not as tight as ECN-style brokers

Not available to US clients

No raw spread account option

Inactivity fee applies

No proprietary platform

AMarkets vs XM: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

2
AMarkets
criteria wins
4
XM
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaAMarketsXM
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Fail
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Fail
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Fail
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

AMarkets vs XM: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, XM ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 3.8/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and XM may each suit different trader profiles.

AMarkets offers tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, compared to XM's spreads from 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, particularly valuable for high-frequency and scalping strategies.

XM has a lower minimum deposit of $5, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes XM more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.

XM holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC, ASF), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: XM has a lower minimum deposit ($5), lowering the barrier to entry; XM offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while XM offers up to 1000:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

AMarkets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for the other broker are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.

AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and XM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; AMarkets exclusively offers cTrader.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

AMarkets

AMarkets

Score 3.8 / 5

Visit AMarkets
Editor's Pick
XM

XM

Score 4.3 / 5

Visit XM

More Broker Comparisons

More AMarkets comparisons

Admirals

AMarketsvsAdmirals

FXTM

AMarketsvsFXTM

Alpari International

AMarketsvsAlpari International

Exness

AMarketsvsExness

FBS

AMarketsvsFBS

Tickmill

AMarketsvsTickmill

HFM

AMarketsvsHFM

Windsor Brokers

AMarketsvsWindsor Brokers

GO Markets

AMarketsvsGO Markets

Dupoin

AMarketsvsDupoin

More XM comparisons

GO Markets

XMvsGO Markets

FXOpen

XMvsFXOpen

Blueberry Markets

XMvsBlueberry Markets

Fusion Markets

XMvsFusion Markets

FxPro

XMvsFxPro

Windsor Brokers

XMvsWindsor Brokers

OctaFX

XMvsOctaFX

RoboForex

XMvsRoboForex

Dupoin

XMvsDupoin

Admirals

XMvsAdmirals

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker