Admiralsvs
AMarketsForex Broker Comparison
This comparison pits Admirals against AMarkets on regulation, pricing, and platform reach. The tension lies between safety credentials and breadth of platforms and instruments.
Our Verdict
Admirals winsby 0.5 pts
Admirals edges AMarkets on the editorial score due to stronger regulation, broader instrument access, and negative balance protection.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Instruments: Admirals 8000 vs AMarkets 250.
- 2Top-tier regulators: Admirals FCA/ASIC/CySEC/KNF; AMarkets SVG FSA.
- 3Negative balance protection: Admirals yes, AMarkets no.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.50 pips for Admirals, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Admirals vs AMarkets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.4 / 5 |
Admirals vs AMarkets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Extensive range of accounts including Zero, Trade, and Invest
Strong FCA and CySEC regulation covering EU and UK traders
High-quality educational content including live webinars
Zero account offers spreads from 0.5 pips with $6 round-turn commission
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Admirals vs AMarkets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
Admirals
criteria wins
1
AMarkets
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Admirals | AMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs AMarkets: Frequently Asked Questions
Admirals rates 4.3/5 versus 3.8/5 for AMarkets. Admirals edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Admirals's 0.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Both Admirals and AMarkets require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
Admirals holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, Admirals provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Admirals lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while AMarkets lists up to 3000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Both Admirals and AMarkets charge the same commission of $6 per lot on applicable accounts.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
