AMarketsvs
ExnessForex Broker Comparison
Two well known forex brokers face off on regulation, protection, and pricing. The matchup pits AMarkets against Exness across platforms, leverage, and cost to reveal where traders may lean.
Our Verdict
Exness winsClear Winner
Exness outranks AMarkets on editorial score and regulatory stature, holding top-tier licenses and offering negative balance protection and compensation; AMarkets remains SVGFSA-regulated with no investor compensation.
Exness
4.4/5
AMarkets
3.8/5
Key Differences
- 1Exness is regulated by FCA/CySEC/FSCA/OJK; AMarkets is SVGFSA-regulated.
- 2Exness provides negative balance protection and investor compensation; AMarkets does not.
- 3AMarkets offers 250 instruments versus Exness 200.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.30 pips for Exness, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
AMarkets vs Exness: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.4/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
AMarkets vs Exness Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
AMarkets vs Exness: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
4
Exness
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Exness |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Exness: Frequently Asked Questions
Exness rates 4.4/5 versus 3.8/5 for AMarkets. Exness edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Exness's 0.3 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Exness has $1, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Exness more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Exness holds top-tier regulation (FCA, FSCA, OJK), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Exness stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Exness lists up to 2000:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Exness charges $3.5 per lot, lower than AMarkets's $6 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Exness supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
