AMarketsvs
SwissquoteForex Broker Comparison
AMarkets and Swissquote face a clash over regulation, costs, and platform choices. The outcome hinges on which aligns best with safety and cost transparency.
Our Verdict
Swissquote winsby 0.4 pts
Swissquote edges AMarkets on editorial score and regulatory breadth.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1AMarkets offers raw spreads; Swissquote does not.
- 2Swissquote operates under FINMA plus FCA/DFSA; AMarkets uses SVGFSA.
- 3Instruments count: 400 vs 250.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Swissquote?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you value 24/5 live chat support and no inactivity fee.
Choose Swissquote if…
Choose Swissquote if you prefer higher regulation and a broader asset range.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.70 pips for Swissquote, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5▲ |
AMarkets vs Swissquote Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
3
AMarkets
criteria wins
5
Swissquote
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Swissquote |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.8/5 and Swissquote rates 4.2/5. Swissquote has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
AMarkets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Swissquote's 1.7 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
AMarkets has $100, while Swissquote requires at least $1120. This makes AMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Swissquote holds top-tier regulation (FCA, DFSA, FINMA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: AMarkets requires a lower minimum deposit ($100), lowering the barrier to entry, and Swissquote provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Swissquote lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Swissquote are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Swissquote supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader. Swissquote has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
