AMarkets vs Pepperstone Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and Pepperstone across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.
VS
Score 4.7 / 5
4 bonusesMulti-regulated Australian ECN-style broker with fast execution, MT4 / MT5 / cTrader / TradingView and a strong active-trader rebate program.
Our Verdict
Pepperstone winsClear Winner
Pepperstone comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.7/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.8/5.
Pepperstone
4.7/5
AMarkets
3.8/5
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Pepperstone has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Best for platform choice
Recommended
Pepperstone offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView, IRESS.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Pepperstone edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.7/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.1 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2007 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Melbourne, Australia |
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | $7/lot |
| Max leverage | 3000:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | FCA ASIC CySEC DFSA BaFin FMA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit AMarkets | Visit Pepperstone |
AMarkets vs Pepperstone Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA licensed
Razor account: tight spreads + transparent commission
TradingView + MT4 / MT5 / cTrader
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection
No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity
Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
Cons
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
4
Pepperstone
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Pepperstone ranks higher with a score of 4.7/5 vs 3.8/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and Pepperstone may each suit different trader profiles.
Both AMarkets and Pepperstone offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.
Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Pepperstone holds top-tier regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.
For beginners: Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum), lowering the barrier to entry; Pepperstone offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Pepperstone offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; Pepperstone exclusively offers TradingView, IRESS.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 3.8 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker