BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

AMarkets vs FP Markets Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and FP Markets across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

AMarkets

AMarkets

Score 3.8 / 5
2 bonuses

SVG FSA-regulated broker with genuine ECN conditions on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, a well-regarded PAMM system, and an established following in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia.

Visit AMarkets
VS
FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5
4 bonuses

True ECN pricing, all three major platforms, strong ASIC regulation, and IRESS integration for share CFDs - a complete package for active traders.

Visit FP Markets
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsClear Winner

FP Markets comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.5/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.8/5.

FP Markets
4.5/5
AMarkets
3.8/5

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for platform choice
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView, IRESS.

Best for beginners
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.5/5 vs 3.8/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

AMarkets vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
AMarketsAMarkets
FP MarketsFP Markets
Editorial score
3.8/ 5
4.5/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
3.4 / 5
4.6 / 5▲
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.0 / 5
4.5 / 5▲
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.1 / 5
4.4 / 5▲
Customer Support
10% weight
3.9 / 5
4.3 / 5▲
Founded20072005
HeadquartersKingstown, Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesSydney, Australia
Min deposit$100$100
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$6/lot$6/lot
Max leverage3000:1500:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
SVGFSA
ASIC
CySEC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
IRESS
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit AMarkets Visit FP Markets

AMarkets vs FP Markets Forex Broker Pros & Cons

AMarketsAMarkets
FP MarketsFP Markets

Pros

MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available

Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission

Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency

No inactivity fee

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips + $6 round-turn commission

Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader - all three major platforms

IRESS platform for direct-access share CFD trading

Strong ASIC and CySEC regulation

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Cons

SVG FSA registration only - no meaningful retail investor protection

No EU or Tier 1 licensed entity

Very high leverage (3000:1) is a risk amplifier

No top-tier regulatory licence

No negative balance protection

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

Limited charting capabilities

Cons

IRESS platform has a monthly fee for lower-volume traders

Customer support primarily oriented toward Australian trading hours

Not available to US residents

No proprietary platform

AMarkets vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

0
AMarkets
criteria wins
4
FP Markets
criteria wins
Ahead
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaAMarketsFP Markets
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Fail
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Fail
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Fail
Pass
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Fail
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

AMarkets vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, FP Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.5/5 vs 3.8/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; AMarkets and FP Markets may each suit different trader profiles.

Both AMarkets and FP Markets offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

Both AMarkets and FP Markets require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.

FP Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Always verify regulatory status with the broker directly before depositing funds.

For beginners: FP Markets offers negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

AMarkets offers maximum leverage of 3000:1, while FP Markets offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

Both AMarkets and FP Markets charge the same commission of $6 per lot on applicable accounts.

AMarkets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and FP Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; FP Markets exclusively offers TradingView, IRESS.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

AMarkets

AMarkets

Score 3.8 / 5

Visit AMarkets
Editor's Pick
FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5

Visit FP Markets

More Broker Comparisons

More AMarkets comparisons

IC Markets

AMarketsvsIC Markets

FXOpen

AMarketsvsFXOpen

Pepperstone

AMarketsvsPepperstone

GO Markets

AMarketsvsGO Markets

Blueberry Markets

AMarketsvsBlueberry Markets

TMGM

AMarketsvsTMGM

Admirals

AMarketsvsAdmirals

ACY Securities

AMarketsvsACY Securities

FxPro

AMarketsvsFxPro

Tickmill

AMarketsvsTickmill

More FP Markets comparisons

GO Markets

FP MarketsvsGO Markets

FXOpen

FP MarketsvsFXOpen

Blueberry Markets

FP MarketsvsBlueberry Markets

Fusion Markets

FP MarketsvsFusion Markets

FxPro

FP MarketsvsFxPro

Windsor Brokers

FP MarketsvsWindsor Brokers

OctaFX

FP MarketsvsOctaFX

RoboForex

FP MarketsvsRoboForex

Dupoin

FP MarketsvsDupoin

Admirals

FP MarketsvsAdmirals

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker