Blueberry Marketsvs
FP MarketsForex Broker Comparison
Two ASIC-regulated brokers compete on cost, platforms, and instrument variety, exposing divergent strengths. The contrast tests execution, transparency, and breadth across these markets.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.2 pts
FP Markets wins on Editorial score (4.5 vs 4.3) with broader regulation (ASIC and CySEC) compared with Blueberry Markets (ASIC and VFSC).
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets includes CySEC regulation in addition to ASIC, while Blueberry uses VFSC.
- 2FP Markets offers IRESS for share CFDs, Blueberry does not.
- 3Blueberry Markets lists 300 tradable instruments, FP Markets offers about 10,000.
Who should choose Blueberry Markets vs FP Markets?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Blueberry Markets if…
Choose Blueberry Markets if you want VFSC regulation and a compact 300-instrument range.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want broader regulation and access to 10,000 instruments across MT4, MT5, and IRESS.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0.00 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Blueberry Markets vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 4.5/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.5 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
Blueberry Markets vs FP Markets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
ASIC-regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Raw ECN Direct account with published execution statistics
No bonus marketing, pure execution focus
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Blueberry Markets vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
Blueberry Markets
criteria wins
3
FP Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Blueberry Markets | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Pass |
Blueberry Markets vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Blueberry Markets rates 4.3/5 and FP Markets rates 4.5/5. FP Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both Blueberry Markets and FP Markets start from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Compare commissions and account types to evaluate total trading costs.
Both Blueberry Markets and FP Markets require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
Both Blueberry Markets and FP Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Blueberry Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while FP Markets lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per lot, lower than Blueberry Markets's $8 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Blueberry Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to IRESS and TradingView.
