BrokerDir.
Forex
Crypto
Stocks
BrokerDir.

The most trusted, data-dense directory for comparing regulated forex brokers worldwide.

Explore

  • All Brokers
  • Features
  • Bonuses
  • Learn
  • Markets
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Broker Warnings

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • How We Cover Brokers
  • Contact

© 2026 BrokerDir. All rights reserved.

High Risk Warning: Trading forex carries a high level of risk.

HomeForexCompare

FP Markets vs TMGM Forex Broker Comparison

A head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and TMGM across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.

FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5
4 bonuses

True ECN pricing, all three major platforms, strong ASIC regulation, and IRESS integration for share CFDs - a complete package for active traders.

Visit FP Markets
VS
TMGM

TMGM

Score 4 / 5
2 bonuses

ASIC-regulated Australian broker with 10,000+ instruments including DMA equities, well-positioned for Asian traders who want Australian regulatory standards alongside a broad asset range.

Visit TMGM
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.5 pts

FP Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.5/5 vs TMGM's 4/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.

Verdict by Trader Profile

Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.

Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited

Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.

Best for safety & regulation
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.

Best for active traders
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets has a cost edge: lower commission ($6/lot).

Best for platform choice
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView, cTrader.

Best for beginners
FP Markets
FP Markets
Recommended

FP Markets edges out TMGM with a higher editorial score (4.5/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.

FP Markets vs TMGM: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison

Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category
FP MarketsFP Markets
TMGMTMGM
Editorial score
4.5/ 5
4.0/ 5
Score Breakdown
Trust & Regulation
40% weight
4.6 / 5▲
4.3 / 5
Fees & Spreads
30% weight
4.5 / 5▲
4.3 / 5
Platforms & Tools
20% weight
4.4 / 5▲
4.2 / 5
Customer Support
10% weight
4.3 / 5▲
4.1 / 5
Founded20052013
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaMelbourne, Australia
Min deposit$100$100
Spreads from0 pips0 pips
Commission / lot$6/lot$7/lot
Max leverage500:1500:1
Withdrawal feeFreeFree
Regulators
ASIC
CySEC
ASIC
VFSC
Platforms
MetaTrader 4
TradingView
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
IRESS
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
IRESS
Active bonuses
Visit brokerVisit FP Markets Visit TMGM

FP Markets vs TMGM Forex Broker Pros & Cons

FP MarketsFP Markets
TMGMTMGM

Pros

True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips + $6 round-turn commission

Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader - all three major platforms

IRESS platform for direct-access share CFD trading

Strong ASIC and CySEC regulation

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

Investor compensation scheme coverage

Raw spread account available

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Multilingual customer support

Pros

10,000+ instruments including real equities via IRESS DMA

ASIC regulated - Tier 1 Australian investor protections

ECN Edge account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 commission

Strong multilingual support for Asian clients

Client funds held in segregated accounts

Negative balance protection

No deposit fees

No inactivity fee

MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported

Mobile trading app available

Advanced charting tools included

Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure

24/5 live chat support

Phone support available

Cons

IRESS platform has a monthly fee for lower-volume traders

Customer support primarily oriented toward Australian trading hours

Not available to US residents

No proprietary platform

Cons

$100 minimum deposit on standard accounts

Less brand recognition than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia

IRESS DMA platform requires separate setup

No investor compensation scheme

No proprietary platform

FP Markets vs TMGM: Detailed Category Breakdown

A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.

1
FP Markets
criteria win
Ahead
0
TMGM
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
CriteriaFP MarketsTMGM
Trust & Regulation
Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.)
Pass
Pass
Segregated client funds
Pass
Pass
Negative balance protection
Pass
Pass
Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS)
Pass
Fail
Fees & Spreads
Raw/ECN spreads available
Pass
Pass
No deposit fee
Pass
Pass
No inactivity fee
Pass
Pass
Transparent pricing page
Pass
Pass
Platforms & Tools
MT4/MT5 available
Pass
Pass
Proprietary platform
Fail
Fail
Mobile app
Pass
Pass
Advanced charting tools
Pass
Pass
Customer Support
24/5 live chat
Pass
Pass
Phone support
Pass
Pass
Multilingual support
Pass
Pass

FP Markets vs TMGM: Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our independent editorial scoring, FP Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.5/5 vs 4/5 for TMGM. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; FP Markets and TMGM may each suit different trader profiles.

Both FP Markets and TMGM offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.

Both FP Markets and TMGM require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.

Both FP Markets and TMGM hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.

For beginners: both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.

FP Markets offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while TMGM offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.

FP Markets charges $6 per lot, lower than TMGM's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.

FP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, TradingView, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, IRESS and TMGM offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, IRESS; FP Markets exclusively offers TradingView, cTrader.

Ready to get started?

Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.

Editor's Pick
FP Markets

FP Markets

Score 4.5 / 5

Visit FP Markets
TMGM

TMGM

Score 4 / 5

Visit TMGM

More Broker Comparisons

More FP Markets comparisons

Blueberry Markets

FP MarketsvsBlueberry Markets

Fusion Markets

FP MarketsvsFusion Markets

Global Prime

FP MarketsvsGlobal Prime

Admirals

FP MarketsvsAdmirals

ACY Securities

FP MarketsvsACY Securities

Windsor Brokers

FP MarketsvsWindsor Brokers

GO Markets

FP MarketsvsGO Markets

FXOpen

FP MarketsvsFXOpen

Moneta Markets

FP MarketsvsMoneta Markets

Tickmill

FP MarketsvsTickmill

More TMGM comparisons

IC Markets

TMGMvsIC Markets

FXOpen

TMGMvsFXOpen

Pepperstone

TMGMvsPepperstone

GO Markets

TMGMvsGO Markets

Blueberry Markets

TMGMvsBlueberry Markets

Admirals

TMGMvsAdmirals

ACY Securities

TMGMvsACY Securities

FxPro

TMGMvsFxPro

Tickmill

TMGMvsTickmill

Global Prime

TMGMvsGlobal Prime

Personalised recommendation

Not sure which broker is right for you?

Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.

Find my broker