ACY Securities vs Blueberry Markets Forex Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of ACY Securities and Blueberry Markets across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Score 4 / 5
2 bonusesASIC-regulated Australian broker with broad 2,200+ instrument coverage, TradingView integration, and raw ECN accounts - stronger on instrument breadth than on brand recognition.
VS
Score 4.3 / 5
2 bonusesPure ASIC-regulated ECN broker with raw spreads from 0.0 pips and a $8 round-turn commission on the Direct account - a straightforward professional-grade execution desk without the marketing overhead of larger brokers.
Our Verdict
Blueberry Markets winsby 0.3 pts
Blueberry Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.3/5 vs ACY Securities's 4/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.
Best for safety & regulation
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Best for active traders
Recommended
ACY Securities has a cost edge: lower commission ($7/lot).
Best for platform choice
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both brokers offer an equivalent platform selection with similar exclusive and proprietary options.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Blueberry Markets edges out ACY Securities with a higher editorial score (4.3/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
ACY Securities vs Blueberry Markets: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.3/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.3 / 5 | 4.5 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.2 / 5 | 4.4 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Sydney, Australia |
| Min deposit | $50 | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | $8/lot |
| Max leverage | 500:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | ASIC FSA Seychelles | ASIC VFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 TradingView | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit ACY Securities | Visit Blueberry Markets |
ACY Securities vs Blueberry Markets Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
2,200+ instruments including share CFDs and ETF CFDs
TradingView integration for browser-based chart execution
ASIC regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 round-turn commission
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
ASIC-regulated with Tier 1 investor protections
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Raw ECN Direct account with published execution statistics
No bonus marketing - pure execution focus
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Cons
$200 minimum for ECN Ultra account
Less established brand than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia
Limited proprietary tools
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Cons
$100 minimum deposit required
Limited product range - forex, indices, commodities, crypto only
No copy trading or social features
ECN commission slightly above the cheapest competitors
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
No phone support
Support available in limited languages
ACY Securities vs Blueberry Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
ACY Securities
criteria wins
0
Blueberry Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | ACY Securities | Blueberry Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
ACY Securities vs Blueberry Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Blueberry Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.3/5 vs 4/5 for ACY Securities. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; ACY Securities and Blueberry Markets may each suit different trader profiles.
Both ACY Securities and Blueberry Markets offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.
ACY Securities has a lower minimum deposit of $50, while Blueberry Markets requires at least $100. This makes ACY Securities more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both ACY Securities and Blueberry Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: ACY Securities has a lower minimum deposit ($50), lowering the barrier to entry; both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
ACY Securities offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while Blueberry Markets offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
ACY Securities charges $7 per lot, lower than Blueberry Markets's $8 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView and Blueberry Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5; ACY Securities exclusively offers TradingView; Blueberry Markets exclusively offers cTrader.
Ready to get started?
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 4 / 5
More Broker Comparisons
More ACY Securities comparisons
More Blueberry Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker