A head-to-head comparison of Fusion Markets and Pepperstone across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and editorial scoring.
One of the lowest-cost ECN brokers globally at $4.50/lot, no minimum deposit, and three platform options - strong value for cost-conscious traders.
Multi-regulated Australian ECN-style broker with fast execution, MT4 / MT5 / cTrader / TradingView and a strong active-trader rebate program.
Pepperstone edges ahead with a score of 4.7/5 vs Fusion Markets's 4.2/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers offer spreads from 0 pips.
Pepperstone has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Fusion Markets has a cost edge: lower commission ($4.5/lot).
Pepperstone offers more exclusive platform options: TradingView, IRESS.
Pepperstone edges out Fusion Markets with a higher editorial score (4.7/5 vs 4.2/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new traders.
| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 4.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.2 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 3.9 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Melbourne, Australia |
| Min deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $4.5/lot | $7/lot |
| Max leverage | 500:1 | 500:1 |
| Withdrawal fee | Free | Free |
| Regulators | ASIC VFSC | FCA ASIC CySEC DFSA BaFin FMA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader | MetaTrader 4 TradingView MetaTrader 5 cTrader IRESS |
| Active bonuses | ||
| Visit broker | Visit Fusion Markets | Visit Pepperstone |
Pros
Among the lowest ECN commissions globally at $4.50/lot round-turn
No minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader
ASIC regulated with strong Australian broker infrastructure
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Pros
FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, DFSA licensed
Razor account: tight spreads + transparent commission
TradingView + MT4 / MT5 / cTrader
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Smaller, newer broker (est. 2017) with limited global brand recognition
Limited research and educational content
VFSC license used for non-AU clients offers fewer protections
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Limited charting capabilities
No 24/5 live chat
No phone support
Support available in limited languages
Cons
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Fusion Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Pepperstone ranks higher with a score of 4.7/5 vs 4.2/5 for Fusion Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual trading needs; Fusion Markets and Pepperstone may each suit different trader profiles.
Both Fusion Markets and Pepperstone offer spreads starting from 0 pips, making them equivalent on this metric. Consider commissions and account types when evaluating total trading costs.
Neither Fusion Markets nor Pepperstone requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Fusion Markets and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Both are considered safe. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners: both brokers offer negative balance protection. Also weigh up educational resources and customer support quality before deciding.
Fusion Markets offers maximum leverage of 500:1, while Pepperstone offers up to 500:1. Available leverage varies by account type, instrument, and jurisdiction. Higher leverage amplifies both potential profits and losses. Always use appropriate risk management.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per lot, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Fusion Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, TradingView, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, IRESS; both support MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader; Pepperstone exclusively offers TradingView, IRESS.
Open an account directly with the broker that suits you best.
Score 4.2 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker