In this side-by-side, two globally regulated FX brokers compete on regulation, pricing and platforms. The axes of choice include raw spreads, MT4/MT5 availability, and instrument breadth.
Interactive Brokers and OANDA are closely matched on regulation, costs, and platforms. The clearest differentiator is instrument breadth, with Interactive Brokers offering far more instruments.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers for access to 17000 instruments and raw spreads. You also benefit from no inactivity fee.
Choose OANDA if…
Choose OANDA for MT4/MT5 support and 24/5 live chat.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Interactive Brokers offers tighter spreads from 0.20 pips vs 1.00 pips for OANDA, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 4.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.8 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
Pros
Available to US residents
Lowest margin rates in industry
150+ global markets
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Interactive Brokers | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Interactive Brokers and OANDA share the same editorial score of 4.6/5. One concrete differentiator: Interactive Brokers has tighter spreads from 0.2 pips.
Interactive Brokers starts from 0.2 pips, tighter than OANDA's 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Neither Interactive Brokers nor OANDA requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Interactive Brokers and OANDA hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Interactive Brokers lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while OANDA lists up to 50:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for OANDA are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile, while OANDA supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS). OANDA has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4.
Equally matched; both are regulated by top-tier authorities and hold client funds in segregated accounts.
Interactive Brokers wins for active traders due to instrument breadth and raw spreads.
Interactive Brokers is better suited for scalpers: raw/ECN spreads available, tighter spreads from 0.20 pips.
OANDA is better for beginners thanks to MT4/MT5 availability.
Interactive Brokers offers far more instruments, 17000 vs 70.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 4.5 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.6 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.0 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 1978 | 1996 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Greenwich, United States | New York, United States |
|---|
| Min Deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0.2 pips▼ lower | 1 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $2/lot | N/A |
|---|
| 0.4 pips | N/A |
| Max Leverage | 50:1 | 50:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | $10/month (after 12 months) |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferACH | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferACH | Bank transferDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | First withdrawal/month free | Free for ACH |
|---|
| Regulators | FCA ASIC JFSA IIROC DFSA CNB CMVM CNV AMF SEC MFSA SFC SEBI CBI CMF NFA FSC FINRA | FCA ASIC CBI CMF NFA |
|---|
| Platforms | Trader Workstation (TWS) Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Investor compensation scheme coverage
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Proprietary trading platform available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Available to US residents (NFA-registered)
Best-in-class research and economic data
No minimum deposit
MT4, MT5 and proprietary platforms
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
Steeper learning curve on TWS
No MT4 / MT5
No MetaTrader support
No 24/5 live chat
Cons
Spreads slightly wider than ECN-style brokers
No copy trading
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.6 / 5
Score 4.6 / 5
Interactive BrokersvsThinkMarkets
Interactive BrokersvsCity Index
Interactive BrokersvsIG
Interactive BrokersvsForex.com
Interactive BrokersvsTrade Nation
Interactive BrokersvsPepperstone
Interactive BrokersvsMarkets.com
Interactive BrokersvsCMC Markets
Interactive BrokersvsVantage
Interactive BrokersvsMoneta Markets
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker