Fusion Marketsvs
Interactive BrokersForex Broker Comparison
The matchup pits cost-focused Fusion Markets against global powerhouse Interactive Brokers. Each emphasizes different strengths across regulation, instruments, and platforms.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsby 0.4 pts
Interactive Brokers edges Fusion Markets on editorial score (4.6 vs 4.2, gap 0.4) and breadth of markets, with 17,000 instruments and top-tier regulation.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Instruments available: Fusion Markets 250 vs Interactive Brokers 17,000.
- 2Proprietary platform: Interactive Brokers yes; Fusion Markets no.
- 3Investor compensation scheme: Interactive Brokers supported; Fusion Markets not.
Who should choose Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose Fusion Markets if…
Choose Fusion Markets if you want ultra-low ECN commissions at $4.5 per lot and access to MT4, MT5, or cTrader.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you need broad global market access with 17,000 instruments, a proprietary platform, and multilingual support.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Fusion Markets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 0.20 pips for Interactive Brokers, reducing trading costs.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 4.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.2 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Among the lowest ECN commissions globally at $4.50/lot round-turn
No minimum deposit and no inactivity fee
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader
ASIC regulated with strong Australian broker infrastructure
ETF CFDs available at the same ultra-low commission rate
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
Fusion Markets
criteria win
5
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Fusion Markets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Pass |
Fusion Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Fusion Markets rates 4.2/5 and Interactive Brokers rates 4.6/5. Interactive Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Fusion Markets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Interactive Brokers's 0.2 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Neither Fusion Markets nor Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Fusion Markets and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Fusion Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while Interactive Brokers lists up to 50:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot, lower than Fusion Markets's $4.5 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Fusion Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. Fusion Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
